mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sha@pengutronix.de" <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: "Stefan Riedmüller" <S.Riedmueller@phytec.de>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand_bbt: Skip bad blocks when searching for the BBT in NAND
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 06:59:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322055902.GO23724@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8683628e4ef3f07ea2281e48478f71d81e00729a.camel@phytec.de>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:14:05PM +0000, Stefan Riedmüller wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> 
> On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 10:41 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Stefan Riedmueller wrote:
> > > The blocks containing the bad block table can become bad as well. So
> > > make sure to skip any blocks that are marked bad when searching for the
> > > bad block table.
> > 
> > The file is a more or less direct copy from the kernel. Does the problem
> > exist in the kernel as well?
> 
> From my point of view I would say yes. I have just made a small test Issue is
> shown in the kernel as well. It is a very raw case where two BBT blocks need
> to be worn out but on the other hand this fix should not have that much of an
> impact.
> 
> I will send a similar patch to the kernel.

I'd like to delay this one until it is accepted in the kernel. I do not
fully understand the consequences of this patch, but hopefully on the
mtd list there is someone.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-16 12:36 [PATCH 1/2] nand: nand-mxs: Fix marking BBT blocks as bad Stefan Riedmueller
2021-03-16 12:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand_bbt: Skip bad blocks when searching for the BBT in NAND Stefan Riedmueller
2021-03-17  9:41   ` Sascha Hauer
2021-03-17 17:14     ` Stefan Riedmüller
2021-03-22  5:59       ` sha [this message]
2021-03-29  7:20         ` Stefan Riedmüller
2021-04-14 13:18           ` Stefan Riedmüller
2021-04-14 14:36             ` sha
2021-04-20  6:29               ` Stefan Riedmüller
2021-05-07  7:52                 ` sha
2021-03-22  5:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] nand: nand-mxs: Fix marking BBT blocks as bad Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322055902.GO23724@pengutronix.de \
    --to=sha@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=S.Riedmueller@phytec.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox