mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <>
Cc:, Ahmad Fatoum <>
Subject: [PATCH master 1/3] ARM: asm: fix miscompilation of 32-bit ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:01:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

gcc-11.1.1 shipped with OSELAS.Toolchain-2021.07.0 hoists a single
instruction from __ARM_SETUP_STACK in front of __barebox_arm_head
breaking the barebox header format for the Raspberry Pi 3. This can't
happen with ARM64 and the Raspberry Pi entry points are currently the
only 32-bit users.

While the resulting barebox image was still bootable, header detection
would fail. Add an intermediate naked function to work around this.

This is not required for plain ENTRY_FUNCTION, because the
board-supplied entry point is already NAKED. For
ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITH_FUNCTION, that same entry point is intentionally
non-naked to reduce pitfalls for board code authors..

Fixes: 880c9803b95a ("ARM: implement ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK")
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <>
 arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
index d915cde294a4..bee906f3a97b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static inline unsigned long arm_mem_barebox_image(unsigned long membase,
 	void name(ulong r0, ulong r1, ulong r2);			\
 	static void __##name(ulong, ulong, ulong);			\
+	static void ____##name(ulong, ulong, ulong);			\
 	void NAKED __section(.text_head_entry_##name)	name		\
 				(ulong r0, ulong r1, ulong r2)		\
@@ -202,7 +203,13 @@ static inline unsigned long arm_mem_barebox_image(unsigned long membase,
 			__ARM_SETUP_STACK(stack_top);			\
 			__##name(r0, r1, r2);				\
 		}							\
-		static void noinline __##name				\
+		static void NAKED noinline __##name			\
+			(ulong r0, ulong r1, ulong r2)			\
+		{							\
+			__ARM_SETUP_STACK(stack_top);			\
+			____##name(r0, r1, r2);				\
+		}							\
+		static void noinline ____##name				\
 			(ulong arg0, ulong arg1, ulong arg2)

barebox mailing list

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 16:01 [PATCH master 0/3] ARM: rpi3: fix misc recent breakage Ahmad Fatoum
2022-04-22 16:01 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2022-04-22 16:01 ` [PATCH master 2/3] clk: add BCM2835 auxiliary peripheral clock driver Ahmad Fatoum
2022-04-22 16:01 ` [PATCH master 3/3] clocksource: assign non-zero priorities to all clocksources Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH master 1/3] ARM: asm: fix miscompilation of 32-bit ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox