From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:26:16 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pPLB4-00GvDu-7m for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:26:16 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pPLB1-0001Ja-5P for lore@pengutronix.de; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:26:15 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wQOV9X9zsvnFnf0vHM/4Jddv6YGaAn0NWe63p0FP+fg=; b=KyGMtbx9SEpccu2IlEs7+pRbej m3K1u3wjfIkLvMvZ2AcmdKSXWx1PuPqAf5np94HjSoddWlR7/j1jAiqkHtZUt73bPHn8WVKIwlLgq WBQ681mLVC1UklPBHniibQw2v5NzAn0+5gUmhIjwPetfFwITXi428SPuLT4vodeuuAzX4IH36gXGR b64upOb2WPDUYRIzEDEX4UmxSHzmEJ8XBszpezizBQs7NLS0atk+Xz/ov9xaM7zGr0PIJoS8wlsxH hYE97yWriGFNd0TX8XSMZouFC29NWIo5ADJdxEyPjTPfNnRM63L9RH79S6MHQhSN4WbeqIDuwpF69 wR2AUebg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pPL9V-00Bh1V-Is; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:24:41 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pPL9R-00Bh0L-0R for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:24:38 +0000 Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pPL9N-0000un-SB; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:24:33 +0100 Received: from mfe by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pPL9N-0007OB-LM; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:24:33 +0100 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:24:33 +0100 From: Marco Felsch To: Lucas Stach Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20230207102433.xihwow72fcxb6vzk@pengutronix.de> References: <20230206210004.627338-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <20230206210004.627338-2-l.stach@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230206210004.627338-2-l.stach@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230207_022437_066024_F14DDE84 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.21 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: i.MX8M: esdctl: use common compatible to detect i.MX8M* DDRC X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de) Hi Lucas, On 23-02-06, Lucas Stach wrote: > All i.MX8M* DDRC nodes are compatible to "fsl,imx8m-ddrc". As the memory > size detection works the same on all of them, there is no need to match > the more specific compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c > index 043de477a77d..2a2bc5205301 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/esdctl.c > @@ -732,13 +732,7 @@ static __maybe_unused struct of_device_id imx_esdctl_dt_ids[] = { > .compatible = "fsl,vf610-ddrmc", > .data = &vf610_data > }, { > - .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ddrc", > - .data = &imx8mq_data > - }, { > - .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-ddrc", > - .data = &imx8mn_data The i.MX8M Nano uses a 16bit bus width according the data. I don't have the datasheet right now to check this. But this commit will change it to 32 bit, is this allowed? Regards, Marco > - }, { > - .compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-ddrc", > + .compatible = "fsl,imx8m-ddrc", > .data = &imx8mq_data > }, { > .compatible = "fsl,imx7d-ddrc", > -- > 2.39.1 > > >