From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: lst@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH RFC 08/12] RISC-V: StarFive: J7100: set /soc/dma-noncoherent
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:05:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230221080524.607241-9-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221080524.607241-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
With upcoming changes, cache handling will be skipped on RISC-V, because
arch is cache-coherent by default. StarFive JH7100 has non-coherent DMA
masters though, so note that in the DT.
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 1 +
arch/riscv/dts/jh7100.dtsi | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
index 0f03637a66bc..c0cac2ca6816 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ config SOC_STARFIVE_JH7100
bool
select SOC_STARFIVE_JH71XX
select SIFIVE_L2
+ select OF_DMA_COHERENCY
help
Unlike JH7110 and later, CPU on the JH7100 are not cache-coherent
with respect to DMA masters like GMAC and DW MMC controller.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/dts/jh7100.dtsi b/arch/riscv/dts/jh7100.dtsi
index e3990582af97..b11801553bf7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/dts/jh7100.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/dts/jh7100.dtsi
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@
#clock-cells = <1>;
compatible = "simple-bus";
ranges;
+ dma-noncoherent;
intram0: sram@18000000 {
compatible = "mmio-sram";
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 8:05 [PATCH RFC 00/12] ARM64: layerscape: make LS1046 DMA coherent Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] usb: dwc3: populate parent of xHCI dev Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] usb: xhci: pass physical device to DMA API Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] net: rtl8169: pass physical device for " Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] firmware: zynqmp-fpga: pass physical device to " Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] net: designware: eqos: " Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] x86: select OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] dma: define CONFIG_OF_DMA_COHERENCY Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] of: populate new device_d::dma_coherent attribute Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-27 10:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-01-11 7:05 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] dma: fix dma_sync when not all device DMA is equally coherent Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] dma: provide of_dma_coherent_fixup helper Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-21 8:05 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] ARM64: layerscape: configure all DMA masters to be cache-coherent Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230221080524.607241-9-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lst@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox