mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] net: phy: sync phy_{write,read,modify}_mmd_indirect with linux
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:43:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230710124318.rfhfoxojpdijhj2g@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e96d425b-3f38-1cd7-fc3f-be4b12d09a75@pengutronix.de>

On 23-07-10, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 10.07.23 13:01, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > On 23-07-10, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> Hello Marco,
> >>
> >> On 10.07.23 12:49, Marco Felsch wrote:
> >>> On 23-07-10, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >>>> On 10.07.23 08:36, Marco Felsch wrote:
> >>>>> Sync the barebox phy_{write,read,modify}_mmd_indirect API with the Linux
> >>>>> phy_{write,read,modify}_mmd API to make it easier and less error prone
> >>>>> to port phy drivers. This also fixes the r8169 driver since this driver
> >>>>> did not adapt the parameters while porting from Linux.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The sync also aligns the function parameter `prtad` as well as the
> >>>>> function documentation.
> >>>>
> >>>> This breaks out of tree board code in a subtle and annoying manner.
> >>>
> >>> Do we really need to care about out all-of-tree drivers/boards? If so,
> >>> we need to ensure to not break any public function.
> >>
> >> Out-of-tree drivers not too much probably, but out-of-tree boards
> >> are unfortunately the norm. Breaking the build can be justified,
> >> but silent breaking by swapping arguments is not nice.
> > 
> > And how do you ensure that a public API is only used by drivers? Don't
> > get me wrong I got your point but if you update an out-of-tree board to
> > a newer barebox version it may happen that something break. Therefore
> > manufacturers should upstream there code to reduce the maintenance
> > effort to a minimum :) I know we don't live in an ideal world :/
> 
> Some breakage is ultimately unavoidable, but we can try to not needlessly
> introduce silent breakage. Here we have a nice way out: We import the
> Linux function with the Linux name and use that for upstream code. The old
> function is marked deprecated and removed later on. Do you see an issue
> with that?

The only problem I see is, that the Linux API does support C45 and C22
and we don't. As said, we can implement it and make the C45 support a
stub. From user perspective I would assume that the new API is working
for both classes (like Linux). Therefore I kept the _indirect suffix
since this makes it clear from API pov.

Regards,
  Marco



  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-10 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-10  6:36 [PATCH 1/7] ARM: boards: make use of MDIO_MMD register defines Marco Felsch
2023-07-10  6:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] net: phy: micrel: " Marco Felsch
2023-07-10  9:56   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10 10:37     ` Marco Felsch
2023-07-10  6:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] net: phy: sync phy_{write,read,modify}_mmd_indirect with linux Marco Felsch
2023-07-10  9:59   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10 10:49     ` Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 10:53       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10 11:01         ` Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 11:03           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10 12:43             ` Marco Felsch [this message]
2023-07-10 12:52               ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10  6:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] net: phy: add phydev_{err,err_probe,info,warn,dbg} macros Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 10:01   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10  6:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] net: phy: at803x: add support for configuring SmartEEE Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 10:10   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10 12:10     ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-07-10  6:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] net: phy: at803x: add disable hibernation mode support Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 10:07   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10 10:53     ` Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 11:07       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10  6:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] net: phy: at803x: disable extended next page bit Marco Felsch
2023-07-10 10:03   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-10  9:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: boards: make use of MDIO_MMD register defines Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230710124318.rfhfoxojpdijhj2g@pengutronix.de \
    --to=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox