From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:25:55 +0100 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rMmpP-008hOX-2k for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:25:55 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rMmpP-0004uH-A3 for lore@pengutronix.de; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:25:55 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=nkSUHBoSHzWb4pjvnF+ilItK8tnhbdhcAAtHkyViSb4=; b=d9VXH71vJMcpNQEbpWMsLZEf9f 6M5D0O9QnsdgQ/Byv8W4d31mVwjSKtiu0oR2cf/VpXxJvquygRyxqmbwh3OH/dgIiNuSUYfSdLSaB PRkIsZdVwik7scQ5hbJJ6ioPz++hwMRjQBivuol2agt3BLls68AZki/kdIL279wwAJRvpnGxkV1Y+ 2mJ4YyrwC6VEybC88CJBc4NeVwQ3oQbO/WZkiPMRwYOHYKKcUwBBCfzd7q4g8dy652avmrq2tJ2La MIhSROkAqtkA8Fg67OOIqdIdi4CpsMKBYgHOQ0OB5a6DDv8M9ujq88YmjrBNThMzw+VotakrdIzLf YTj2Yl7g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rMmoG-004bQf-1d; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:24:44 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rMmoD-004bPy-0B for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:24:42 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rMmoB-0004e6-OX; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:24:39 +0100 Received: from [2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::54] (helo=dude05.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMmoB-001DzI-Bf; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:24:39 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=dude05.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude05.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rMmoB-005XTO-0l; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:24:39 +0100 From: Ahmad Fatoum To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Cc: Peter Mamonov , Yann Sionneau , Ahmad Fatoum Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:24:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20240108102438.1318473-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240108102438.1318473-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20240108102438.1318473-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240108_022441_115325_BA903461 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.87 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] dma: don't allow override of dma_alloc/dma_free X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) There are no architectures left defining their own dma_alloc/dma_free. Instead, they define DMA_ALIGNMENT and use 's common implementation. This will be useful later on, as we can use DMA_ALIGNMENT for sanity checking with CONFIG_DMA_DEBUG_API. Till then, ensure we get no new architecture-specific definitions of dma_alloc/dma_free, by preventing override of the implementation. Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum --- include/dma.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/dma.h b/include/dma.h index 266a7f323fa5..df9807b4f2e4 100644 --- a/include/dma.h +++ b/include/dma.h @@ -21,19 +21,15 @@ #define DMA_ALIGNMENT 32 #endif -#ifndef dma_alloc static inline void *dma_alloc(size_t size) { return xmemalign(DMA_ALIGNMENT, ALIGN(size, DMA_ALIGNMENT)); } -#endif -#ifndef dma_free static inline void dma_free(void *mem) { free(mem); } -#endif #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) -- 2.39.2