From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>,
BAREBOX <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] habv4: use hab rom implementation of report_event
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:20:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240117072025.GE4700@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15aa742d-9670-4da5-a65b-263d44e260cb@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:13:48AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> On 12.01.24 16:21, Stefan Kerkmann wrote:
> > +static enum hab_status hab_sip_report_event(enum hab_status status,
> > + uint32_t index, uint8_t *event,
> > + size_t *bytes)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> > +
> > + v8_flush_dcache_range((unsigned long)bytes,
> > + (unsigned long)bytes + sizeof(*bytes));
> > +
> > + if (event)
> > + v8_flush_dcache_range((unsigned long)event,
> > + (unsigned long)event + *bytes);
>
> I am not too happy about the cache maintenance here. *event and *bytes
> are both stack memory, which share a cache line with other stack variables.
>
> This issue exists in hab_sip_report_status too, so this need not delay
> application of the series, but it would nice to get this cleaned up,
> eventually.
>
> A first attempt was here:
> https://lore.barebox.org/barebox/20230921095649.310666-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/
>
> I am also unsure if cache maintenance is correct, see:
> https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/archives/list/tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org/message/D3PIAW7G2B3JQIH5BGMUZZKHPGNMXUUT/
>
> > +static enum hab_status imx8m_report_event(enum hab_status status,
> > + uint32_t index, uint8_t *event,
> > + size_t *bytes)
> > +{
> > + if (cpu_is_mx8mm() || cpu_is_mx8mn() || cpu_is_imx8mp())
>
> I suggest we swap the if else clauses and use cpu_is_mx8mq(). imx8m_read_sram_events
> only supports that one SoC now and it's likely that new SoCs (e.g. i.MX9) will
> also reuse hab_sip_report_event. Could you send a fixup?
I fixed this part up here.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 15:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] Use HABv4 report_event implementation for imx8mm and imx8mn Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-12 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] habv4: correct habv4 rom vector table Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-12 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] habv4: use hab rom implementation of report_event Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-12 16:29 ` Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-16 6:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-01-16 8:13 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-01-17 7:20 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2024-01-17 7:45 ` Stefan Kerkmann
2024-01-16 6:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Use HABv4 report_event implementation for imx8mm and imx8mn Sascha Hauer
2024-01-16 7:09 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240117072025.GE4700@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox