* [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sync with linux code base
@ 2024-03-22 16:45 Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev Marco Felsch
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-22 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Re-sync our code base with Linux which moved quite a lot. This patch is
huge but still is only a partly sync. The main changes are:
- The nvmem_cell struct was split into nvmem_cell and nvmem_cell_entry
- The cells are now parsed and registered during nvmem_register(), no
longer during of_nvmem_cell_get()
- The registered cells are now tracked per nvmem device, no longer in
a global nvmem_cells list
This prepares our code base also to include the new nvmem-layout drivers
and to expose cells via cdevs.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
Hi Sascha,
I know this patch is large, but I wasn't unsure if the sync should be
done this way or by more fine grain patches, which takes far longer.
Regards,
Marco
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 428 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h | 9 +-
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 30 +++
3 files changed, 301 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 67bb1d799376..657025daddb3 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct nvmem_device {
bool read_only;
struct cdev cdev;
void *priv;
+ struct list_head cells;
nvmem_cell_post_process_t cell_post_process;
int (*reg_write)(void *ctx, unsigned int reg,
const void *val, size_t val_size);
@@ -32,18 +33,25 @@ struct nvmem_device {
void *val, size_t val_size);
};
-struct nvmem_cell {
+struct nvmem_cell_entry {
const char *name;
- const char *id;
int offset;
+ size_t raw_len;
int bytes;
int bit_offset;
int nbits;
+ void *priv;
+ struct device_node *np;
struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
struct list_head node;
};
-static LIST_HEAD(nvmem_cells);
+struct nvmem_cell {
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
+ const char *id;
+ int index;
+};
+
static LIST_HEAD(nvmem_devs);
void nvmem_devices_print(void)
@@ -136,40 +144,25 @@ static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
return NULL;
}
-static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_find_cell(const char *cell_id)
+static void nvmem_cell_entry_add(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
{
- struct nvmem_cell *p;
-
- list_for_each_entry(p, &nvmem_cells, node)
- if (!strcmp(p->name, cell_id))
- return p;
-
- return NULL;
+ list_add_tail(&cell->node, &cell->nvmem->cells);
}
-static void nvmem_cell_drop(struct nvmem_cell *cell)
-{
- list_del(&cell->node);
- kfree(cell->id);
- kfree(cell);
-}
-
-static void nvmem_cell_add(struct nvmem_cell *cell)
-{
- list_add_tail(&cell->node, &nvmem_cells);
-}
-
-static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- const struct nvmem_cell_info *info,
- struct nvmem_cell *cell)
+static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
+ const struct nvmem_cell_info *info,
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
{
cell->nvmem = nvmem;
cell->offset = info->offset;
+ cell->raw_len = info->raw_len ?: info->bytes;
cell->bytes = info->bytes;
cell->name = info->name;
+ cell->priv = info->priv;
cell->bit_offset = info->bit_offset;
cell->nbits = info->nbits;
+ cell->np = info->np;
if (cell->nbits)
cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
@@ -178,13 +171,110 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
dev_err(&nvmem->dev,
"cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
- cell->name, nvmem->stride);
+ cell->name ?: "<unknown>", nvmem->stride);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
+static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
+ const struct nvmem_cell_info *info,
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(nvmem, info, cell);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ cell->name = kstrdup_const(info->name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cell->name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * nvmem_add_one_cell() - Add one cell information to an nvmem device
+ *
+ * @nvmem: nvmem device to add cells to.
+ * @info: nvmem cell info to add to the device
+ *
+ * Return: 0 or negative error code on failure.
+ */
+int nvmem_add_one_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
+ const struct nvmem_cell_info *info)
+{
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell;
+ int rval;
+
+ cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cell)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ rval = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry(nvmem, info, cell);
+ if (rval) {
+ kfree(cell);
+ return rval;
+ }
+
+ nvmem_cell_entry_add(cell);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_add_one_cell);
+
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
+ struct device_node *child;
+ const __be32 *addr;
+ int len, ret;
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFTREE))
+ return 0;
+
+ for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
+ struct nvmem_cell_info info = {0};
+
+ addr = of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
+ if (!addr)
+ continue;
+ if (len < 2 * sizeof(u32)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n", child);
+ of_node_put(child);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ info.offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+ info.bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+ info.name = basprintf("%pOFn", child);
+
+ addr = of_get_property(child, "bits", &len);
+ if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
+ info.bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+ info.nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+ }
+
+ info.np = of_node_get(child);
+
+ ret = nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
+ kfree(info.name);
+ if (ret) {
+ of_node_put(child);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_legacy_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+{
+ return nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(nvmem, nvmem->dev.of_node);
+}
+
/**
* nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
*
@@ -216,8 +306,15 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
np = config->cdev ? config->cdev->device_node : config->dev->of_node;
nvmem->dev.of_node = np;
nvmem->priv = config->priv;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvmem->cells);
nvmem->cell_post_process = config->cell_post_process;
+ rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_legacy_of(nvmem);
+ if (rval) {
+ kfree(nvmem);
+ return ERR_PTR(rval);
+ }
+
if (config->read_only || !config->reg_write || of_property_read_bool(np, "read-only"))
nvmem->read_only = true;
@@ -254,32 +351,21 @@ static int of_nvmem_device_ensure_probed(struct device_node *np)
return of_device_ensure_probed(np);
}
-static struct nvmem_device *__nvmem_device_get(struct device_node *np,
- struct nvmem_cell **cellp,
- const char *cell_id)
+static struct nvmem_device *__nvmem_device_get(struct device_node *np)
{
struct nvmem_device *nvmem = NULL;
int ret;
- if (np) {
- ret = of_nvmem_device_ensure_probed(np);
- if (ret)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
- nvmem = of_nvmem_find(np);
- if (!nvmem)
- return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
- } else {
- struct nvmem_cell *cell = nvmem_find_cell(cell_id);
+ if (!np)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- if (cell) {
- nvmem = cell->nvmem;
- *cellp = cell;
- }
+ ret = of_nvmem_device_ensure_probed(np);
+ if (ret)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
- if (!nvmem)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- }
+ nvmem = of_nvmem_find(np);
+ if (!nvmem)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
nvmem->users++;
@@ -310,6 +396,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_device_get(struct device_node *np, const char *id)
{
struct device_node *nvmem_np;
+ struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
int index = 0;
if (id)
@@ -319,7 +406,9 @@ struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_device_get(struct device_node *np, const char *id)
if (!nvmem_np)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- return __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np, NULL, NULL);
+ nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np);
+ of_node_put(nvmem_np);
+ return nvmem;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_nvmem_device_get);
#endif
@@ -361,103 +450,101 @@ void nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_put);
-static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_cell_get_from_list(const char *cell_id)
+static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_create_cell(struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry,
+ const char *id, int index)
{
- struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
- struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
+ struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+ const char *name = NULL;
- nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(NULL, &cell, cell_id);
- if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
- return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
+ cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cell)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ if (id) {
+ name = kstrdup_const(id, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name) {
+ kfree(cell);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+ }
+
+ cell->id = name;
+ cell->entry = entry;
+ cell->index = index;
return cell;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFTREE)
+static struct nvmem_cell_entry *
+nvmem_find_cell_entry_by_node(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *iter, *cell = NULL;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &nvmem->cells, node) {
+ if (np == iter->np) {
+ cell = iter;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return cell;
+}
+
/**
* of_nvmem_cell_get() - Get a nvmem cell from given device node and cell id
*
- * @dev node: Device tree node that uses the nvmem cell
- * @id: nvmem cell name from nvmem-cell-names property.
+ * @np: Device tree node that uses the nvmem cell.
+ * @id: nvmem cell name from nvmem-cell-names property, or NULL
+ * for the cell at index 0 (the lone cell with no accompanying
+ * nvmem-cell-names property).
*
* Return: Will be an ERR_PTR() on error or a valid pointer
* to a struct nvmem_cell. The nvmem_cell will be freed by the
* nvmem_cell_put().
*/
-struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np,
- const char *name)
+struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np, const char *id)
{
struct device_node *cell_np, *nvmem_np;
- struct nvmem_cell *cell;
struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
- const __be32 *addr;
- int rval, len, index;
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell_entry;
+ struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+ int index = 0;
+ int cell_index = 0;
- index = of_property_match_string(np, "nvmem-cell-names", name);
+ /* if cell name exists, find index to the name */
+ if (id)
+ index = of_property_match_string(np, "nvmem-cell-names", id);
cell_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "nvmem-cells", index);
if (!cell_np)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
nvmem_np = of_get_parent(cell_np);
- if (!nvmem_np)
+ if (!nvmem_np) {
+ of_node_put(cell_np);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
- nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np, NULL, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
- return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
-
- addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "reg", &len);
- if (!addr || (len < 2 * sizeof(u32))) {
- dev_err(&nvmem->dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n", cell_np);
- rval = -EINVAL;
- goto err_mem;
- }
-
- cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!cell) {
- rval = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_mem;
}
- cell->nvmem = nvmem;
- cell->offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
- cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
- cell->name = cell_np->name;
- cell->id = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
-
- addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "bits", &len);
- if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
- cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
- cell->nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+ nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np);
+ of_node_put(nvmem_np);
+ if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
+ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
}
- if (cell->nbits)
- cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
- BITS_PER_BYTE);
-
- if (cell->bytes < nvmem->word_size)
- cell->bytes = nvmem->word_size;
-
- if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
- dev_err(&nvmem->dev,
- "cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
- cell->name, nvmem->stride);
- rval = -EINVAL;
- goto err_sanity;
+ cell_entry = nvmem_find_cell_entry_by_node(nvmem, cell_np);
+ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ if (!cell_entry) {
+ __nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
- nvmem_cell_add(cell);
+ cell = nvmem_create_cell(cell_entry, id, cell_index);
+ if (IS_ERR(cell))
+ __nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
return cell;
-
-err_sanity:
- kfree(cell);
-
-err_mem:
- __nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-
- return ERR_PTR(rval);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_nvmem_cell_get);
#endif
@@ -465,8 +552,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_nvmem_cell_get);
/**
* nvmem_cell_get() - Get nvmem cell of device form a given cell name
*
- * @dev node: Device tree node that uses the nvmem cell
- * @id: nvmem cell name to get.
+ * @dev: Device that requests the nvmem cell.
+ * @id: nvmem cell name to get (this corresponds with the name from the
+ * nvmem-cell-names property for DT systems)
*
* Return: Will be an ERR_PTR() on error or a valid pointer
* to a struct nvmem_cell. The nvmem_cell will be freed by the
@@ -482,29 +570,31 @@ struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_cell_get(struct device *dev, const char *cell_id)
return cell;
}
- return nvmem_cell_get_from_list(cell_id);
+ return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_get);
/**
* nvmem_cell_put() - Release previously allocated nvmem cell.
*
- * @cell: Previously allocated nvmem cell by nvmem_cell_get()
+ * @cell: Previously allocated nvmem cell by nvmem_cell_get().
*/
void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell)
{
- struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
+ struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->entry->nvmem;
+
+ if (cell->id)
+ kfree_const(cell->id);
+ kfree(cell);
__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
- nvmem_cell_drop(cell);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_put);
-static inline void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
- void *buf)
+static void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, void *buf)
{
u8 *p, *b;
- int i, bit_offset = cell->bit_offset;
+ int i, extra, bit_offset = cell->bit_offset;
p = b = buf;
if (bit_offset) {
@@ -519,22 +609,28 @@ static inline void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
p = b;
*b++ >>= bit_offset;
}
-
- /* result fits in less bytes */
- if (cell->bytes != DIV_ROUND_UP(cell->nbits, BITS_PER_BYTE))
- *p-- = 0;
+ } else {
+ /* point to the msb */
+ p += cell->bytes - 1;
}
+
+ /* result fits in less bytes */
+ extra = cell->bytes - DIV_ROUND_UP(cell->nbits, BITS_PER_BYTE);
+ while (--extra >= 0)
+ *p-- = 0;
+
/* clear msb bits if any leftover in the last byte */
- *p &= GENMASK((cell->nbits%BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1, 0);
+ if (cell->nbits % BITS_PER_BYTE)
+ *p &= GENMASK((cell->nbits % BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1, 0);
}
static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_cell *cell,
- void *buf, size_t *len)
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
+ void *buf, size_t *len, const char *id, int index)
{
int rc;
- rc = nvmem->reg_read(nvmem->priv, cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
+ rc = nvmem->reg_read(nvmem->priv, cell->offset, buf, cell->raw_len);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -543,13 +639,14 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
if (nvmem->cell_post_process) {
- rc = nvmem->cell_post_process(nvmem->priv, cell->id,
+ rc = nvmem->cell_post_process(nvmem->priv, id,
cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
if (rc)
return rc;
}
- *len = cell->bytes;
+ if (len)
+ *len = cell->bytes;
return 0;
}
@@ -558,26 +655,28 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
* nvmem_cell_read() - Read a given nvmem cell
*
* @cell: nvmem cell to be read.
- * @len: pointer to length of cell which will be populated on successful read.
+ * @len: pointer to length of cell which will be populated on successful read;
+ * can be NULL.
*
- * Return: ERR_PTR() on error or a valid pointer to a char * buffer on success.
- * The buffer should be freed by the consumer with a kfree().
+ * Return: ERR_PTR() on error or a valid pointer to a buffer on success. The
+ * buffer should be freed by the consumer with a kfree().
*/
void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, size_t *len)
{
- struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry = cell->entry;
+ struct nvmem_device *nvmem = entry->nvmem;
u8 *buf;
int rc;
if (!nvmem)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- buf = kzalloc(cell->bytes, GFP_KERNEL);
+ buf = kzalloc(max_t(size_t, entry->raw_len, entry->bytes), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- rc = __nvmem_cell_read(nvmem, cell, buf, len);
- if (rc < 0) {
+ rc = __nvmem_cell_read(nvmem, cell->entry, buf, len, cell->id, cell->index);
+ if (rc) {
kfree(buf);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
}
@@ -586,7 +685,7 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, size_t *len)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_read);
-static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
+static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
u8 *_buf, int len)
{
struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
@@ -638,16 +737,7 @@ static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
return buf;
}
-/**
- * nvmem_cell_write() - Write to a given nvmem cell
- *
- * @cell: nvmem cell to be written.
- * @buf: Buffer to be written.
- * @len: length of buffer to be written to nvmem cell.
- *
- * Return: length of bytes written or negative on failure.
- */
-int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
+static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
{
struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
int rc;
@@ -656,6 +746,14 @@ int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
(cell->bit_offset == 0 && len != cell->bytes))
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Any cells which have a cell_post_process hook are read-only because
+ * we cannot reverse the operation and it might affect other cells,
+ * too.
+ */
+ if (nvmem->cell_post_process)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits) {
buf = nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(cell, buf, len);
if (IS_ERR(buf))
@@ -668,11 +766,25 @@ int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
kfree(buf);
- if (rc < 0)
+ if (rc)
return rc;
return len;
}
+
+/**
+ * nvmem_cell_write() - Write to a given nvmem cell
+ *
+ * @cell: nvmem cell to be written.
+ * @buf: Buffer to be written.
+ * @len: length of buffer to be written to nvmem cell.
+ *
+ * Return: length of bytes written or negative on failure.
+ */
+int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ return __nvmem_cell_entry_write(cell->entry, buf, len);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_write);
/**
@@ -688,19 +800,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_write);
ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf)
{
- struct nvmem_cell cell;
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry cell;
int rc;
ssize_t len;
if (!nvmem)
return -EINVAL;
- rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(nvmem, info, &cell);
- if (rc < 0)
+ rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(nvmem, info, &cell);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- rc = __nvmem_cell_read(nvmem, &cell, buf, &len);
- if (rc < 0)
+ rc = __nvmem_cell_read(nvmem, &cell, buf, &len, NULL, 0);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
return len;
@@ -719,17 +831,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_cell_read);
int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf)
{
- struct nvmem_cell cell;
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry cell;
int rc;
if (!nvmem)
return -EINVAL;
- rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(nvmem, info, &cell);
+ rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(nvmem, info, &cell);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
- return nvmem_cell_write(&cell, buf, cell.bytes);
+ return __nvmem_cell_entry_write(&cell, buf, cell.bytes);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_cell_write);
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
index 397c4c29dafd..54643b792aed 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
@@ -17,14 +17,7 @@ struct device_node;
/* consumer cookie */
struct nvmem_cell;
struct nvmem_device;
-
-struct nvmem_cell_info {
- const char *name;
- unsigned int offset;
- unsigned int bytes;
- unsigned int bit_offset;
- unsigned int nbits;
-};
+struct nvmem_cell_info;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM)
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 3c30e18409c8..ccac60696a28 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -17,6 +17,28 @@
struct nvmem_device;
+/**
+ * struct nvmem_cell_info - NVMEM cell description
+ * @name: Name.
+ * @offset: Offset within the NVMEM device.
+ * @raw_len: Length of raw data (without post processing).
+ * @bytes: Length of the cell.
+ * @bit_offset: Bit offset if cell is smaller than a byte.
+ * @nbits: Number of bits.
+ * @np: Optional device_node pointer.
+ * @priv: Opaque data passed to the read_post_process hook.
+ */
+struct nvmem_cell_info {
+ const char *name;
+ unsigned int offset;
+ size_t raw_len;
+ unsigned int bytes;
+ unsigned int bit_offset;
+ unsigned int nbits;
+ struct device_node *np;
+ void *priv;
+};
+
/* used for vendor specific post processing of cell data */
typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, const char *id,
unsigned int offset, void *buf,
@@ -48,6 +70,8 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_regmap_register(struct regmap *regmap, const char *na
struct nvmem_device *nvmem_regmap_register_with_pp(struct regmap *regmap,
const char *name, nvmem_cell_post_process_t cell_post_process);
struct nvmem_device *nvmem_partition_register(struct cdev *cdev);
+int nvmem_add_one_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
+ const struct nvmem_cell_info *info);
#else
@@ -73,5 +97,11 @@ static inline struct nvmem_device *nvmem_partition_register(struct cdev *cdev)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
}
+static inline int nvmem_add_one_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
+ const struct nvmem_cell_info *info)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_NVMEM */
#endif /* ifndef _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H */
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev
2024-03-22 16:45 [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sync with linux code base Marco Felsch
@ 2024-03-22 16:45 ` Marco Felsch
2024-03-25 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path Marco Felsch
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-22 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Expose the nvmem cells via cdevs which is our equivalent to the Linux
sysfs exposure. This allows the easier user queries for board code and
shell. Keep the Linux function name scheme for
nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells() to reduce the diff for nvmem_register()
function.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 657025daddb3..b4a29e4b67f3 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ struct nvmem_cell_entry {
struct device_node *np;
struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
struct list_head node;
+
+ struct cdev cdev;
};
struct nvmem_cell {
@@ -144,6 +146,107 @@ static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
return NULL;
}
+static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_create_cell(struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry,
+ const char *id, int index);
+
+static ssize_t nvmem_cell_cdev_read(struct cdev *cdev, void *buf, size_t count,
+ loff_t offset, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
+ struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
+ size_t cell_sz, read_len;
+ void *content;
+
+ entry = container_of(cdev, struct nvmem_cell_entry, cdev);
+ cell = nvmem_create_cell(entry, entry->name, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(cell))
+ return PTR_ERR(cell);
+
+ if (!cell)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ content = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &cell_sz);
+ if (IS_ERR(content)) {
+ read_len = PTR_ERR(content);
+ goto destroy_cell;
+ }
+
+ read_len = min_t(unsigned int, cell_sz - offset, count);
+ memcpy(buf, content + offset, read_len);
+ kfree(content);
+
+destroy_cell:
+ kfree_const(cell->id);
+ kfree(cell);
+
+ return read_len;
+}
+
+static ssize_t nvmem_cell_cdev_write(struct cdev *cdev, const void *buf, size_t count,
+ loff_t offset, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
+ struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+ int ret;
+
+ entry = container_of(cdev, struct nvmem_cell_entry, cdev);
+
+ if (!entry->nvmem->reg_write)
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ if (offset >= entry->bytes)
+ return -EFBIG;
+
+ if (offset + count > entry->bytes)
+ count = entry->bytes - offset;
+
+ cell = nvmem_create_cell(entry, entry->name, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(cell))
+ return PTR_ERR(cell);
+
+ if (!cell)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = nvmem_cell_write(cell, buf, count);
+
+ kfree_const(cell->id);
+ kfree(cell);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static struct cdev_operations nvmem_cell_chrdev_ops = {
+ .read = nvmem_cell_cdev_read,
+ .write = nvmem_cell_cdev_write,
+};
+
+static int nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
+ struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
+
+ if (list_empty(&nvmem->cells))
+ return 0;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &nvmem->cells, node) {
+ struct cdev *cdev;
+ int ret;
+
+ cdev = &entry->cdev;
+ cdev->name = xasprintf("%s.%s", dev_name(dev),
+ kbasename(entry->name));
+ cdev->ops = &nvmem_cell_chrdev_ops;
+ cdev->dev = dev;
+ cdev->size = entry->bytes;
+
+ ret = devfs_create(cdev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void nvmem_cell_entry_add(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
{
list_add_tail(&cell->node, &cell->nvmem->cells);
@@ -337,6 +440,12 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
}
}
+ rval = nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells(nvmem);
+ if (rval) {
+ kfree(nvmem);
+ return ERR_PTR(rval);
+ }
+
list_add_tail(&nvmem->node, &nvmem_devs);
return nvmem;
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev Marco Felsch
@ 2024-03-25 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-25 10:59 ` Marco Felsch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2024-03-25 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Felsch; +Cc: barebox
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:45:56PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Expose the nvmem cells via cdevs which is our equivalent to the Linux
> sysfs exposure. This allows the easier user queries for board code and
> shell. Keep the Linux function name scheme for
> nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells() to reduce the diff for nvmem_register()
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 657025daddb3..b4a29e4b67f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ struct nvmem_cell_entry {
> struct device_node *np;
> struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> struct list_head node;
> +
> + struct cdev cdev;
> };
>
> struct nvmem_cell {
> @@ -144,6 +146,107 @@ static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_create_cell(struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry,
> + const char *id, int index);
> +
> +static ssize_t nvmem_cell_cdev_read(struct cdev *cdev, void *buf, size_t count,
> + loff_t offset, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
> + struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
> + size_t cell_sz, read_len;
> + void *content;
> +
> + entry = container_of(cdev, struct nvmem_cell_entry, cdev);
> + cell = nvmem_create_cell(entry, entry->name, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(cell))
> + return PTR_ERR(cell);
> +
> + if (!cell)
> + return -EINVAL;
>From looking at the implementation of nvmem_create_cell() I'd say this
can't happen.
> +
> + content = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &cell_sz);
> + if (IS_ERR(content)) {
> + read_len = PTR_ERR(content);
> + goto destroy_cell;
> + }
> +
> + read_len = min_t(unsigned int, cell_sz - offset, count);
> + memcpy(buf, content + offset, read_len);
> + kfree(content);
> +
> +destroy_cell:
> + kfree_const(cell->id);
> + kfree(cell);
> +
> + return read_len;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t nvmem_cell_cdev_write(struct cdev *cdev, const void *buf, size_t count,
> + loff_t offset, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
> + struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> + int ret;
> +
> + entry = container_of(cdev, struct nvmem_cell_entry, cdev);
> +
> + if (!entry->nvmem->reg_write)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + if (offset >= entry->bytes)
> + return -EFBIG;
> +
> + if (offset + count > entry->bytes)
> + count = entry->bytes - offset;
> +
> + cell = nvmem_create_cell(entry, entry->name, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(cell))
> + return PTR_ERR(cell);
> +
> + if (!cell)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = nvmem_cell_write(cell, buf, count);
> +
> + kfree_const(cell->id);
> + kfree(cell);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cdev_operations nvmem_cell_chrdev_ops = {
> + .read = nvmem_cell_cdev_read,
> + .write = nvmem_cell_cdev_write,
> +};
> +
> +static int nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
> + struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
> +
> + if (list_empty(&nvmem->cells))
> + return 0;
This is unnecessary.
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &nvmem->cells, node) {
> + struct cdev *cdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cdev = &entry->cdev;
> + cdev->name = xasprintf("%s.%s", dev_name(dev),
> + kbasename(entry->name));
> + cdev->ops = &nvmem_cell_chrdev_ops;
> + cdev->dev = dev;
> + cdev->size = entry->bytes;
> +
> + ret = devfs_create(cdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
Can't we just register a cdev when the cell is actually created? Why do
we iterate over all cells instead?
I am looking at the corresponding kernel code and I wonder how
u-boot-env is supposed to work. In u_boot_env_probe() first
nvmem_register() is called and nvmem_add_one_cell() for each variable
afterwards. nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells() is called during
nvmem_register(), so how are the variables added later are supposed to
get a sysfs entry?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void nvmem_cell_entry_add(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
> {
> list_add_tail(&cell->node, &cell->nvmem->cells);
> @@ -337,6 +440,12 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
> }
> }
>
> + rval = nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells(nvmem);
> + if (rval) {
> + kfree(nvmem);
It's fine returning an error without cleaning up properly, but freeing
the memory on an half registered device is leading to memory
corruptions which must be fixed. We have the same in barebox master
already:
> rval = register_device(&nvmem->dev);
> if (rval) {
> kfree(nvmem);
> return ERR_PTR(rval);
> }
>
> if (!config->cdev) {
> rval = nvmem_register_cdev(nvmem, config->name);
> if (rval) {
> kfree(nvmem);
Either we unregister the previously registered device before freeing the
memory or we keep the allocation, but freeing the memory without
unregistering the device is wrong.
> return ERR_PTR(rval);
> }
> }
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev
2024-03-25 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2024-03-25 10:59 ` Marco Felsch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-25 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
On 24-03-25, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:45:56PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Expose the nvmem cells via cdevs which is our equivalent to the Linux
> > sysfs exposure. This allows the easier user queries for board code and
> > shell. Keep the Linux function name scheme for
> > nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells() to reduce the diff for nvmem_register()
> > function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvmem/core.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > index 657025daddb3..b4a29e4b67f3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ struct nvmem_cell_entry {
> > struct device_node *np;
> > struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> > struct list_head node;
> > +
> > + struct cdev cdev;
> > };
> >
> > struct nvmem_cell {
> > @@ -144,6 +146,107 @@ static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_create_cell(struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry,
> > + const char *id, int index);
> > +
> > +static ssize_t nvmem_cell_cdev_read(struct cdev *cdev, void *buf, size_t count,
> > + loff_t offset, unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > + struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
> > + struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
> > + size_t cell_sz, read_len;
> > + void *content;
> > +
> > + entry = container_of(cdev, struct nvmem_cell_entry, cdev);
> > + cell = nvmem_create_cell(entry, entry->name, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(cell))
> > + return PTR_ERR(cell);
> > +
> > + if (!cell)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> From looking at the implementation of nvmem_create_cell() I'd say this
> can't happen.
Right, I took it from the Linux implementation and wanted to keep the
diff small. But I can change it.
> > +
> > + content = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &cell_sz);
> > + if (IS_ERR(content)) {
> > + read_len = PTR_ERR(content);
> > + goto destroy_cell;
> > + }
> > +
> > + read_len = min_t(unsigned int, cell_sz - offset, count);
> > + memcpy(buf, content + offset, read_len);
> > + kfree(content);
> > +
> > +destroy_cell:
> > + kfree_const(cell->id);
> > + kfree(cell);
> > +
> > + return read_len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t nvmem_cell_cdev_write(struct cdev *cdev, const void *buf, size_t count,
> > + loff_t offset, unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > + struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
> > + struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + entry = container_of(cdev, struct nvmem_cell_entry, cdev);
> > +
> > + if (!entry->nvmem->reg_write)
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + if (offset >= entry->bytes)
> > + return -EFBIG;
> > +
> > + if (offset + count > entry->bytes)
> > + count = entry->bytes - offset;
> > +
> > + cell = nvmem_create_cell(entry, entry->name, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(cell))
> > + return PTR_ERR(cell);
> > +
> > + if (!cell)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = nvmem_cell_write(cell, buf, count);
> > +
> > + kfree_const(cell->id);
> > + kfree(cell);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct cdev_operations nvmem_cell_chrdev_ops = {
> > + .read = nvmem_cell_cdev_read,
> > + .write = nvmem_cell_cdev_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
> > + struct nvmem_cell_entry *entry;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&nvmem->cells))
> > + return 0;
>
> This is unnecessary.
Sure.
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(entry, &nvmem->cells, node) {
> > + struct cdev *cdev;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + cdev = &entry->cdev;
> > + cdev->name = xasprintf("%s.%s", dev_name(dev),
> > + kbasename(entry->name));
> > + cdev->ops = &nvmem_cell_chrdev_ops;
> > + cdev->dev = dev;
> > + cdev->size = entry->bytes;
> > +
> > + ret = devfs_create(cdev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> Can't we just register a cdev when the cell is actually created? Why do
> we iterate over all cells instead?
Reason for me was to align the nvmem_register() function more with the
Linux variant to port other features like layouts more easily and to
import fixes more easily.
> I am looking at the corresponding kernel code and I wonder how
> u-boot-env is supposed to work. In u_boot_env_probe() first
> nvmem_register() is called and nvmem_add_one_cell() for each variable
> afterwards. nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells() is called during
> nvmem_register(), so how are the variables added later are supposed to
> get a sysfs entry?
I think they don't supposed to get an sysfs entry at all since the
uboot_env handling uses the partitions mechanism. To make it work with
the new sysfs interface the u-boot driver need to be changed to an
nvmem-layout driver, which is the new way of abstracting an layout.
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void nvmem_cell_entry_add(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
> > {
> > list_add_tail(&cell->node, &cell->nvmem->cells);
> > @@ -337,6 +440,12 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + rval = nvmem_populate_sysfs_cells(nvmem);
> > + if (rval) {
> > + kfree(nvmem);
>
> It's fine returning an error without cleaning up properly, but freeing
> the memory on an half registered device is leading to memory
> corruptions which must be fixed. We have the same in barebox master
> already:
>
> > rval = register_device(&nvmem->dev);
> > if (rval) {
> > kfree(nvmem);
> > return ERR_PTR(rval);
> > }
> >
> > if (!config->cdev) {
> > rval = nvmem_register_cdev(nvmem, config->name);
> > if (rval) {
> > kfree(nvmem);
>
> Either we unregister the previously registered device before freeing the
> memory or we keep the allocation, but freeing the memory without
> unregistering the device is wrong.
You're right, I'll fix that.
Regards,
Marco
>
> > return ERR_PTR(rval);
> > }
> > }
>
> Sascha
>
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path
2024-03-22 16:45 [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sync with linux code base Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev Marco Felsch
@ 2024-03-22 16:45 ` Marco Felsch
2024-03-25 9:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvmem: allow single and dynamic device ids Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] eeprom: at24: fix device name handling Marco Felsch
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-22 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Constify the nvmem_*_write() functions as the write functions shouldn't
alter the buffer content.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 10 +++++-----
include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index b4a29e4b67f3..7d795d5873dc 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -794,8 +794,8 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, size_t *len)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_read);
-static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
- u8 *_buf, int len)
+static inline const void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
+ const u8 *_buf, int len)
{
struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
int i, rc, nbits, bit_offset = cell->bit_offset;
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cel
return buf;
}
-static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
+static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, const void *buf, size_t len)
{
struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
int rc;
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell, void *buf, si
*
* Return: length of bytes written or negative on failure.
*/
-int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, size_t len)
+int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, const void *buf, size_t len)
{
return __nvmem_cell_entry_write(cell->entry, buf, len);
}
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_cell_read);
* Return: length of bytes written or negative error code on failure.
* */
int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf)
+ struct nvmem_cell_info *info, const void *buf)
{
struct nvmem_cell_entry cell;
int rc;
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
index 54643b792aed..478f469c3560 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void *nvmem_cell_get_and_read(struct device_node *np, const char *cell_name,
int nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(struct device *dev, const char *cell_id,
u32 *val);
-int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, size_t len);
+int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, const void *buf, size_t len);
/* direct nvmem device read/write interface */
struct nvmem_device *nvmem_device_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int nvmem_device_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, unsigned int offset,
ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf);
int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf);
+ struct nvmem_cell_info *info, const void *buf);
void nvmem_devices_print(void);
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline int nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(struct device *dev,
}
static inline int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
- void *buf, size_t len)
+ const void *buf, size_t len)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static inline ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
static inline int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
struct nvmem_cell_info *info,
- void *buf)
+ const void *buf)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path Marco Felsch
@ 2024-03-25 9:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-25 10:33 ` Marco Felsch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2024-03-25 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Felsch; +Cc: barebox
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Constify the nvmem_*_write() functions as the write functions shouldn't
> alter the buffer content.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 10 +++++-----
> include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index b4a29e4b67f3..7d795d5873dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -794,8 +794,8 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, size_t *len)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_read);
>
> -static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
> - u8 *_buf, int len)
> +static inline const void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
> + const u8 *_buf, int len)
We already had this, this reverts a change you introduced with the nvmem
update in patch 1. So better squash it into that patch.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path
2024-03-25 9:51 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2024-03-25 10:33 ` Marco Felsch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-25 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
On 24-03-25, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Constify the nvmem_*_write() functions as the write functions shouldn't
> > alter the buffer content.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvmem/core.c | 10 +++++-----
> > include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h | 8 ++++----
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > index b4a29e4b67f3..7d795d5873dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > @@ -794,8 +794,8 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, size_t *len)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_read);
> >
> > -static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
> > - u8 *_buf, int len)
> > +static inline const void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell,
> > + const u8 *_buf, int len)
>
> We already had this, this reverts a change you introduced with the nvmem
> update in patch 1. So better squash it into that patch.
Argh.. you're right, I will squash it. Thanks!
Regards,
Marco
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] nvmem: allow single and dynamic device ids
2024-03-22 16:45 [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sync with linux code base Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path Marco Felsch
@ 2024-03-22 16:45 ` Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] eeprom: at24: fix device name handling Marco Felsch
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-22 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Right now the core implementation always make use of DEVICE_ID_DYNAMIC.
This does not allow us having static devices supplied via the of-aliases
node. Therefore sync the code base with Linux to allow single ids,
albeit the id handling is still different.
While on it fix the nvmem_register_cdev() by using the dev_name() which
honors the DEVICE_ID_* cases else we end up with different names for the
devfs and the device itself.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 7d795d5873dc..c5ed1ce962dd 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -421,10 +421,16 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
if (config->read_only || !config->reg_write || of_property_read_bool(np, "read-only"))
nvmem->read_only = true;
- dev_set_name(&nvmem->dev, config->name);
- nvmem->dev.id = DEVICE_ID_DYNAMIC;
-
- dev_dbg(nvmem->dev.parent, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
+ dev_set_name(&nvmem->dev, config->name ? : "nvmem");
+ switch (config->id) {
+ case NVMEM_DEVID_NONE:
+ nvmem->dev.id = DEVICE_ID_SINGLE;
+ break;
+ case NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO:
+ default:
+ nvmem->dev.id = DEVICE_ID_DYNAMIC;
+ break;
+ }
rval = register_device(&nvmem->dev);
if (rval) {
@@ -433,7 +439,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
}
if (!config->cdev) {
- rval = nvmem_register_cdev(nvmem, config->name);
+ rval = nvmem_register_cdev(nvmem, dev_name(&nvmem->dev));
if (rval) {
kfree(nvmem);
return ERR_PTR(rval);
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index ccac60696a28..33db9ba53d35 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
struct nvmem_device;
+#define NVMEM_DEVID_NONE (-1)
+#define NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO (-2)
+
/**
* struct nvmem_cell_info - NVMEM cell description
* @name: Name.
@@ -47,6 +50,7 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, const char *id,
struct nvmem_config {
struct device *dev;
const char *name;
+ int id;
bool read_only;
struct cdev *cdev;
int stride;
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] eeprom: at24: fix device name handling
2024-03-22 16:45 [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sync with linux code base Marco Felsch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvmem: allow single and dynamic device ids Marco Felsch
@ 2024-03-22 16:45 ` Marco Felsch
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2024-03-22 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
The at24 driver does not need to handle the ids by its own since the
nvmem_core does the handling too. This lead into issues where the eeprom
device is named: eeprom00.
Fix the alias handling too since the devie would never be named as
described in the alias, since we never told the nvmem-core to not add an
additional id.
Furthermore the devname can be static since the name gets later
allocated by the dev_set_name().
Fix these three issues by just using the alias or the static "eeprom"
sting and supply the correct NVMEM_DEVID_NONE or NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO to the
core.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/eeprom/at24.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/eeprom/at24.c
index 23cb0e1fbbc9..a5079279af35 100644
--- a/drivers/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct device *dev)
struct at24_data *at24;
int err;
unsigned i, num_addresses;
- char *devname;
+ const char *devname;
const char *alias;
if (dev->platform_data) {
@@ -425,16 +425,10 @@ static int at24_probe(struct device *dev)
at24->num_addresses = num_addresses;
alias = of_alias_get(dev->of_node);
- if (alias) {
- devname = xstrdup(alias);
- } else {
- err = cdev_find_free_index("eeprom");
- if (err < 0) {
- dev_err(&client->dev, "no index found to name device\n");
- goto err_device_name;
- }
- devname = xasprintf("eeprom%d", err);
- }
+ if (alias)
+ devname = alias;
+ else
+ devname = "eeprom";
writable = !(chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
@@ -489,6 +483,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct device *dev)
at24->nvmem_config.stride = 1;
at24->nvmem_config.word_size = 1;
at24->nvmem_config.size = chip.byte_len;
+ at24->nvmem_config.id = alias ? NVMEM_DEVID_NONE : NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO;
at24->nvmem = nvmem_register(&at24->nvmem_config);
err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(at24->nvmem);
@@ -505,7 +500,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct device *dev)
if (gpio_is_valid(at24->wp_gpio))
gpio_free(at24->wp_gpio);
kfree(at24->writebuf);
-err_device_name:
kfree(at24);
err_out:
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "probe error %d\n", err);
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-25 10:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-22 16:45 [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sync with linux code base Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvmem: expose nvmem cells as cdev Marco Felsch
2024-03-25 9:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-25 10:59 ` Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvmem: constify the write path Marco Felsch
2024-03-25 9:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-25 10:33 ` Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvmem: allow single and dynamic device ids Marco Felsch
2024-03-22 16:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] eeprom: at24: fix device name handling Marco Felsch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox