From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: Improve comment about vendor BBM and address verschwurbelung
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 16:46:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240506144606.1562643-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240506144606.1562643-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To better describe why the BBM is at offset 2000 describe the full
misinterpretation^Wmapping of the NAND memory that the i.MX hardware
implements.
Also adapt the comment to reality: A BBT is created automatically since
commit 2ad441bb7e78 ("mtd: nand-imx: Create BBT automatically when
necessary") which was included in v2020.03.0.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c
index c6533b20fc0f..f7ef2e4374a9 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c
@@ -1528,20 +1528,32 @@ static const struct nand_controller_ops mxcnd_controller_ops = {
* 512b data + 16b OOB +
* 512b data + 16b OOB
*
+ * So the mapping between original NAND addressing (as intended by the chip
+ * vendor) and interpretation when accessed via the i.MX NAND controller is as
+ * follows:
+ *
+ * original | i.MX
+ * ---------------------+---------------------
+ * data 0x0000 - 0x0200 | data 0x0000 - 0x0200
+ * data 0x0200 - 0x0210 | oob 0x0000 - 0x0010
+ * data 0x0210 - 0x0410 | data 0x0200 - 0x0400
+ * data 0x0410 - 0x0420 | oob 0x0010 - 0x0020
+ * data 0x0420 - 0x0620 | data 0x0400 - 0x0600
+ * data 0x0620 - 0x0630 | oob 0x0020 - 0x0030
+ * data 0x0630 - 0x0800 | data 0x0600 - 0x07d0
+ * oob 0x0000 - 0x0030 | data 0x07d0 - 0x0800
+ * oob 0x0030 - 0x0040 | oob 0x0030 - 0x0040
+ *
* This means that the factory provided bad block marker ends up
- * in the page data at offset 2000 instead of in the OOB data.
+ * in the page data at offset 2000 = 0x7d0 instead of in the OOB data.
*
- * To preserve the factory bad block information we take the following
- * strategy:
- *
- * - If the NAND driver detects that no flash BBT is present on 2k NAND
- * chips it will not create one because it would do so based on the wrong
- * BBM position
- * - This command is used to create a flash BBT then.
+ * If the NAND driver detects that no flash BBT is present on a 2k NAND
+ * chip it will create one automatically in the assumption that the NAND is
+ * pristine (that is completely erased with only vendor BBMs in the OOB) to
+ * preserve factory bad block information.
*
* From this point on we can forget about the BBMs and rely completely
* on the flash BBT.
- *
*/
static int checkbad(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t ofs)
{
@@ -1562,8 +1574,10 @@ static int checkbad(struct nand_chip *chip, loff_t ofs)
return ret;
if (buf[2000] != 0xff)
+ /* block considered bad */
return 1;
+ /* block considered good */
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-06 14:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: Only automatically create BBT if NAND seems to be pristine Uwe Kleine-König
2024-05-06 14:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2024-05-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: Cleanup code creating bad block table Uwe Kleine-König
2024-05-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: Add error message if BBT creation fails Uwe Kleine-König
2024-05-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: Only automatically create BBT if NAND seems to be pristine Uwe Kleine-König
2024-05-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240506144606.1562643-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox