From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 06 May 2024 18:06:30 +0200 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s40rG-006DLz-2H for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 06 May 2024 18:06:30 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s40rG-0004tk-6b for lore@pengutronix.de; Mon, 06 May 2024 18:06:30 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wIdWOD/csqlI4UP9oHgKD0dqAHQTqhBFvCvNxLt+L0g=; b=fidNskUAFzxO+HXNvyxFHzxE+K SE1Na+wVpBfUGmsu+vgmOaSPo1fOlfjCbuPoSAZzurJb25veEl6ywAqXTU8tgyystrxw+vhpxWnD5 hH6TQc9l1SUSQUx6ry1xv57731uq7GTkqLJ6g6t8d31fCMjHJNNFfWCb+WigbARHjjlWJ7+TieTED eziajb81fOITohrtS+K/2BZO9N0sUn+LIwSWZgzKVKR5Uy6PtHruE3P/F1W9cf+2RhRUse+A8ksKs Jaze29M08RoV1HIDeCY4Z6pwk/34HIwsc3SO8StExESOAQYEhEWZT/2B+ehOzInIAdCp7QpW3vjbV IDH6ZPbg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s40qi-00000007z0T-37pf; Mon, 06 May 2024 16:05:56 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s40qf-00000007yzS-04Ma for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 16:05:54 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s40nh-0003yu-5V; Mon, 06 May 2024 18:02:49 +0200 Received: from [2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::54] (helo=dude05.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s40ng-00GIQR-PM; Mon, 06 May 2024 18:02:48 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=dude05.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude05.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s40ng-009E6k-2E; Mon, 06 May 2024 18:02:48 +0200 From: Ahmad Fatoum To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Cc: Ahmad Fatoum Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 18:02:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20240506160246.2198975-2-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240506160246.2198975-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20240506160246.2198975-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240506_090553_151323_D16F86CC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.36 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: [PATCH master 2/3] pstore: fix size of OF fixup memory region X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) struct resource::end points at the last byte of a region, but we pointed 1 byte after it instead. Fix this, so we have a proper (aligned) size for the memory region. It's possible this had no adverse effect. Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum --- fs/pstore/ram.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c index 4732bd4e3154..9ecf7ef5e901 100644 --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int ramoops_of_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *data) int ret; res.start = pdata->mem_address; - res.end = res.start + pdata->mem_size; + res.end = res.start + pdata->mem_size - 1; res.name = "ramoops"; ret = of_fixup_reserved_memory(root, &res); -- 2.39.2