From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: jianqiang wang <wjq.sec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/9] net: ks8851_mll: do not read past the receive buffer
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 10:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240528085806.1172689-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528085806.1172689-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
the hardware may report a packet longer than our receive buffer. Instead
of reading past the receive buffer, discard too long packets.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c b/drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c
index 2120657bd9..936191597a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c
@@ -420,6 +420,23 @@ static inline void ks_inblk(struct ks_net *ks, u16 *wptr, u32 len)
*wptr++ = (u16)readw(ks->hw_addr);
}
+/**
+ * ks_discardblk - read a block of data from QMU discarding the data
+ * @ks: The chip state
+ * @len: length in byte to read
+ *
+ * This discards a block of data, used when a packet is longer than our receive
+ * buffer. I don't know if it is necessary to discard the data like this, but
+ * it is the easy way out to fix the behaviour with too large packets without
+ * risking regressions.
+ */
+static inline void ks_discardblk(struct ks_net *ks, u32 len)
+{
+ len >>= 1;
+ while (len--)
+ (void)readw(ks->hw_addr);
+}
+
/**
* ks_outblk - write data to QMU.
* @ks: The chip information
@@ -676,16 +693,23 @@ static int ks8851_rx_frame(struct ks_net *ks)
tmp_rxqcr = ks_rdreg16(ks, KS_RXQCR);
ks_wrreg16(ks, KS_RXQCR, tmp_rxqcr | RXQCR_SDA);
- /* read 2 bytes for dummy, 2 for status, 2 for len*/
- ks_inblk(ks, ks->rx_buf, 2 + 2 + 2);
- ks_inblk(ks, ks->rx_buf, ALIGN(RxLen, 4));
+ if (RxLen <= PKTSIZE) {
+ /* read 2 bytes for dummy, 2 for status, 2 for len*/
+ ks_inblk(ks, ks->rx_buf, 2 + 2 + 2);
+ ks_inblk(ks, ks->rx_buf, ALIGN(RxLen, 4));
+ } else {
+ ks_discardblk(ks, 2 + 2 + 2 + ALIGN(RxLen, 4));
+ }
+
ks_wrreg16(ks, KS_RXQCR, tmp_rxqcr);
if (RxStatus & RXFSHR_RXFV) {
/* Pass to upper layer */
- dev_dbg(dev, "passing packet to upper layer\n\n");
- net_receive(&ks->edev, ks->rx_buf, RxLen);
- return RxLen;
+ if (RxLen <= PKTSIZE) {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "passing packet to upper layer\n\n");
+ net_receive(&ks->edev, ks->rx_buf, RxLen);
+ }
+ return;
} else if (RxStatus & RXFSHR_ERR) {
dev_err(dev, "RxStatus error 0x%04x\n", RxStatus & RXFSHR_ERR);
if (RxStatus & RXFSHR_RXICMPFCS)
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 8:57 [PATCH v3 0/9] net: do not read past " Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] net: cs8900: simplify buffer read loop Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] net: cs8900: do not read past the receive buffer Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:58 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2024-05-28 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] net: liteeth: " Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] net: liteeth: do not set len to 0 before printing it Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] net: smc911x: Fix amount of words read from RX FIFO Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] net: smc911x: do not read past the receive buffer Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 13:29 ` Jules Maselbas
2024-05-28 14:23 ` [PATCH] fixup! " Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] " Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 14:37 ` Jules Maselbas
2024-05-28 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] net: ks8851_mll: drop return value from ks8851_rx_frame() Sascha Hauer
2024-05-28 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] net: let net rx hook return void Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240528085806.1172689-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=wjq.sec@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox