mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] hardening: support initializing stack variables by default
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:20:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241125152024.477375-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125152024.477375-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

Uninitialized stack variables can be abused for information exposures
and may even be leveraged for exploits.

Add options to initialize the stack by default.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 Makefile              | 14 ++++++++
 lib/Kconfig.hardening | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 7f7dde9e6bc9..a1ee82692564 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -689,6 +689,20 @@ endif
 
 KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG) += -Wno-gnu
 
+# Initialize all stack variables with a 0xAA pattern.
+KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN)	+= -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern
+
+# Initialize all stack variables with a zero value.
+ifdef CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER
+# https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44842
+CC_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER := -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang
+export CC_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(CC_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER)
+endif
+endif
+
 KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_WERROR) += -Werror
 
 # This warning generated too much noise in a regular build.
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.hardening b/lib/Kconfig.hardening
index 95dd10085410..8e392d4e8e60 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.hardening
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.hardening
@@ -12,6 +12,82 @@ config BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION
 
 menu "Memory initialization"
 
+config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern)
+
+config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_BARE
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero)
+
+config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER
+	# Clang 16 and later warn about using the -enable flag, but it
+	# is required before then.
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang)
+	depends on !CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_BARE
+
+config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO
+	def_bool CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_BARE || CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER
+
+choice
+	prompt "Initialize barebox stack variables at function entry"
+	default INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN if COMPILE_TEST && CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN
+	default INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO
+	default INIT_STACK_NONE
+	help
+	  This option enables initialization of stack variables at
+	  function entry time. This has the possibility to have the
+	  greatest coverage (since all functions can have their
+	  variables initialized), but the performance impact depends
+	  on the function calling complexity of a given workload's
+	  syscalls.
+
+	  This chooses the level of coverage over classes of potentially
+	  uninitialized variables. The selected class of variable will be
+	  initialized before use in a function.
+
+	config INIT_STACK_NONE
+		bool "no automatic stack variable initialization (weakest)"
+		help
+		  Disable automatic stack variable initialization.
+		  This leaves barebox vulnerable to the standard
+		  classes of uninitialized stack variable exploits
+		  and information exposures.
+
+	config INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN
+		bool "pattern-init everything (strongest)"
+		depends on CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN
+		help
+		  Initializes everything on the stack (including padding)
+		  with a specific debug value. This is intended to eliminate
+		  all classes of uninitialized stack variable exploits and
+		  information exposures, even variables that were warned about
+		  having been left uninitialized.
+
+		  Pattern initialization is known to provoke many existing bugs
+		  related to uninitialized locals, e.g. pointers receive
+		  non-NULL values, buffer sizes and indices are very big. The
+		  pattern is situation-specific; Clang on 64-bit uses 0xAA
+		  repeating for all types and padding except float and double
+		  which use 0xFF repeating (-NaN). Clang on 32-bit uses 0xFF
+		  repeating for all types and padding.
+
+	config INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO
+		bool "zero-init everything (strongest and safest)"
+		depends on CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO
+		help
+		  Initializes everything on the stack (including padding)
+		  with a zero value. This is intended to eliminate all
+		  classes of uninitialized stack variable exploits and
+		  information exposures, even variables that were warned
+		  about having been left uninitialized.
+
+		  Zero initialization provides safe defaults for strings
+		  (immediately NUL-terminated), pointers (NULL), indices
+		  (index 0), and sizes (0 length), so it is therefore more
+		  suitable as a production security mitigation than pattern
+		  initialization.
+
+endchoice
+
 config INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON
 	bool "Enable heap memory zeroing on allocation by default"
 	depends on !MALLOC_LIBC
-- 
2.39.5




  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-25 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-25 15:20 [PATCH 0/5] malloc: add options to zero-initialize buffers Ahmad Fatoum
2024-11-25 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] dlmalloc: add aliases with dl as prefix Ahmad Fatoum
2024-11-25 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] hardening: support zeroing all malloc buffers by default Ahmad Fatoum
2024-11-25 15:20 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2024-11-25 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] kbuild: support register zeroing on function exit Ahmad Fatoum
2024-11-25 15:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] tlsf: panic in asserts if CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION=y Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241125152024.477375-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox