[PATCH 8/9] ARM: zynq: call common arm lowlevel init from zynq lowlevel init

[Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>]

This had previously been reverted as it may cause some stack
usage. Now that we have a stack on entry, it should be safe to
so.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
---
 arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c | 1 -
 arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c             | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c
index c681764bd009..1ecddf24085f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c
+++ b/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c
@@ -301,7 +301,6 @@ ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK(start_avnet_zedboard, 0xfffff000, r0, r1, r2)
 	writel((1<<7), 0xe000a208 );    // Output enable
 	writel((1<<7), 0xe000a040 );    // DATA Register
 
-	arm_cpu_lowlevel_init();
 	zynq_cpu_lowlevel_init();
 
 	avnet_zedboard_ps7_init();
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c
index 7194c7e21627..cc7b8d1142a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
 
 void zynq_cpu_lowlevel_init(void)
 {
+	arm_cpu_lowlevel_init();
+
 	enable_arm_errata_761320_war();
 	enable_arm_errata_794072_war();
 	enable_arm_errata_845369_war();
-- 
2.47.1