From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:47:35 +0100 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vIZjb-00HWdf-2D for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:47:35 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vIZjb-0001BX-5X for lore@pengutronix.de; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:47:35 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=ivf+BuYCg+2/ZFWsKsWVI3ywPEHdIeNRVFiryezAtPI=; b=C0Tp2Ckk875HAJypjH2s3ctGn8 znZpZusPlUYSjdkgMUxjp5JD4OHvGGbGp0bvImIsoRxc1RlxQfB3m6LyRzWNg302gUeAG8uUey7a6 405+p/0JGEg66FH7EjlfPDMUnUmCoAj65JTGb4zQB9CzFsb7mptd+BgqmASm2bnT9TiKciOX9X8XJ cR98HBD2tiPB1e/wlDKLExHRBws1FPwhsuKYL04o4K0ztDBDgCh6FVMz+/0FhGjF/Mui3LDZ3OWOK NCxiNyP5IxkttcFu6MoLxroqqk2REQBIg7JOaUI92hswUYKaVIeBB6ipqp5lRZT2jbAbYbsbrxxkQ K231GTtg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vIZiz-00000006AoE-0nqr; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:46:57 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vIZiw-00000006Anr-1fo8 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:46:55 +0000 Received: from dude06.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::5c]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vIZit-000127-G9; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:46:51 +0100 From: Fabian Pflug To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Cc: Fabian Pflug Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:46:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20251110214648.2738052-1-f.pflug@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251110_134654_438984_A0B3B419 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.94 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: [PATCH] security: policy: allow querying the active policy X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) Sometimes it is needed from board code to not to check what is allowed, but what is the currently activated security policy to do some stuff. Signed-off-by: Fabian Pflug --- include/security/policy.h | 1 + security/policy.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/security/policy.h b/include/security/policy.h index c41220ef3b..3eedf6e5ac 100644 --- a/include/security/policy.h +++ b/include/security/policy.h @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ const struct security_policy *security_policy_get(const char *name); int security_policy_activate(const struct security_policy *policy); int security_policy_select(const char *name); void security_policy_list(void); +bool security_policy_is_active(const char *name); #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_POLICY int __security_policy_register(const struct security_policy policy[]); diff --git a/security/policy.c b/security/policy.c index 85333d9e6f..abb956014d 100644 --- a/security/policy.c +++ b/security/policy.c @@ -225,6 +225,14 @@ static int security_policy_get_name(struct param_d *param, void *priv) return 0; } +bool security_policy_is_active(const char *name) +{ + if (!active_policy) + return false; + + return !strcmp(name, active_policy->name); +} + static int security_init(void) { register_device(&security_device); -- 2.47.3