From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:43:27 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wuP9z-002awd-0D for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:43:27 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A310420128B for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:43:27 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=tSbfxMUe; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From:Reply-To: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Owner; bh=anCo4s6rqBuQNq3Clu4+ueo8neTAJIob7A406ZFnbY8=; b=tSbfxMUeeQdkpZ 76KEuEqt5OWgJxC8cOoUwaX9IhFg4xPlX56aNNZfhXvu8G6yB5/bX0If5vEAxAbxUib5ivjCWH5gu ftXMDP6cuGeHdgwWrFtdvU1lCNX+DeS/CN0q9EyGfjzZOpDmf16W0oCtrkGBgUY9Ckp/ow1lV//mq 3NkoT4Mo2BZ4FkdmLVeydj7kenZUnpiWtwFGA09Ytpn1h0RauYUhZteQ6HKKHEKOdmc/KfgdkrBXB jkM52MoT3REbTYkX8h8CMhj1B66bcU1mv/ayYdovc3lee6VFUg6e1/7n7JBvMqD9qPMoC3needh48 bf+DFpzQl60Ql0E4il7A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wuP8e-0000000HUxz-0LaY; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:42:04 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wuP8a-0000000HUwu-0voh for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:42:02 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:560:5c58:8900:9ebf:dff:fe00:fdb5]) (Authenticated sender: sha@pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8BFF20128B; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:41:55 +0200 (CEST) From: "Sascha Hauer" Subject: Re: RK3588 optee question To: "Alexander Shiyan" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:41:55 +0000 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260812_234200_419328_12B6656F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.59 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 2026-08-12 17:44, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > Hello Sascha. > > After enabling CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP_ATF_PASS_FDT=y the following build > errors occur: > > CC [P] arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588.pbl.o > [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Barebox List Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: cii38zhaoc3f5ho54e7rfix1eu13jn4d X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.91 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2607:7c80:54:3::133:from]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(0.00)[m:eagle.alexander923@gmail.com,m:barebox@lists.infradead.org,m:eaglealexander923@gmail.com,s:lore@pengutronix.de]; FORWARDED(0.00)[barebox@lists.infradead.org]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_FORWARDING(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A310420128B Message-ID: <20260813064155.TaLuwgpeK6L0RQyT2kUY1bcP9b56R7SHE2RYtABI6cg@z> On 2026-08-12 17:44, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > Hello Sascha. > > After enabling CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP_ATF_PASS_FDT=y the following build > errors occur: > > CC [P] arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3588.pbl.o > In file included from include/linux/array_size.h:6, > from include/linux/kernel.h:6, > from /home/ARM64/barebox/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h:17, > from include/mach/rockchip/bootrom.h:9, > from arch/arm/mach-rockchip/bootrom.c:2: > include/linux/build_bug.h:100:41: error: static assertion failed: > "sizeof(structrockchip_scratch_space) <= CONFIG_SCRATCH_SIZE" Set CONFIG_SCRATCH_SIZE=0x100000 Seems we have to look into it to get a sane default. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |