From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] ARM: fix scratch mem position with OP-TEE
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 19:17:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21a75102-0a15-bbfb-137b-5c20956f9656@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512111008.1120833-2-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Hi,
On 12.05.23 13:09, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> OP-TEE is placed right below the end of memory, so the scratch space
> has to go below it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
> index 0cf4549cd7..711ccd2510 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void *barebox_arm_boot_dtb(void);
>
> static inline const void *arm_mem_scratch_get(void)
> {
> - return (const void *)__arm_mem_scratch(arm_mem_endmem_get());
> + return (const void *)__arm_mem_scratch(arm_mem_endmem_get() - OPTEE_SIZE);
PBL uses __arm_mem_scratch, so you would've to add OPTEE_SIZE there.
I hadn't done it, because I wrote arm_mem_scratch_get() with the expectation
that OPTEE_SIZE would be omitted from the RAM bank size, so it gets mapped
uncacheable by simply being considered non-RAM, see for example the usage
sites of CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IMX8M*_OPTEE. You'll have to fix these sites
too to avoid reserving the memory twice.
> }
>
> #define arm_mem_stack_top(membase, endmem) ((endmem) - SZ_64K - OPTEE_SIZE)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-12 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-12 11:09 [PATCH 00/27] ARM: MMU rework Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 01/27] ARM: fix scratch mem position with OP-TEE Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:17 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 02/27] ARM: drop cache function initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:19 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 03/27] ARM: Add _32 suffix to aarch32 specific filenames Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 04/27] ARM: cpu.c: remove unused include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:22 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 05/27] ARM: mmu-common.c: use common mmu include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:23 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 06/27] ARM: mmu32: rename mmu.h to mmu_32.h Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:23 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 07/27] ARM: mmu: implement MAP_FAULT Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 08/27] ARM: mmu64: Use arch_remap_range where possible Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 17:40 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 09/27] ARM: mmu32: implement zero_page_*() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 10/27] ARM: i.MX: Drop HAB workaround Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 18:09 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-16 8:23 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 11/27] ARM: Move early MMU after malloc initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 18:10 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 12/27] ARM: mmu: move dma_sync_single_for_device to extra file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 18:30 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-16 9:09 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 13/27] ARM: mmu: merge mmu-early_xx.c into mmu_xx.c Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 14/27] ARM: mmu: alloc 64k for early page tables Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 15/27] ARM: mmu32: create alloc_pte() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 16/27] ARM: mmu64: " Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 17/27] ARM: mmu: drop ttb argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:09 ` [PATCH 18/27] ARM: mmu: always do MMU initialization early when MMU is enabled Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 19/27] ARM: mmu32: Assume MMU is on Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 20/27] ARM: mmu32: Fix pmd_flags_to_pte() for ARMv4/5/6 Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 21/27] ARM: mmu32: Add pte_flags_to_pmd() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 22/27] ARM: mmu32: add get_pte_flags, get_pmd_flags Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 23/27] ARM: mmu32: move functions into c file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 24/27] ARM: mmu32: read TTB value from register Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 25/27] ARM: mmu32: Use pages for early MMU setup Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 26/27] ARM: mmu32: Skip reserved ranges during initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-12 11:10 ` [PATCH 27/27] ARM: mmu64: Use two level pagetables in early code Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 10:55 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21a75102-0a15-bbfb-137b-5c20956f9656@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox