mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
	Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@barebox.org>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] common: deep-probe: support specifying support in DT
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 17:40:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bde04b0-5caa-4b06-aa00-fc7b24afb2dc@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528152431.db7nmbovzxkllf2u@pengutronix.de>

Hi,

On 5/28/25 17:24, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 25-05-28, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> New boards should be deep probe enabled by default, which is currently
>> done via board code. We want to support second stage boot on new boards
>> without board code however, which means we need the possibility to make
>> deep probe opt-out instead of opt-in.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@barebox.org>
>> ---

[snip]

>> +	/* deep probe requires resources to be described in DT */
>> +	root = of_get_root_node();
>> +	if (!root)
>> +		return false;
> 
> 	if (!root) {
> 		boardstate = DEEP_PROBE_NOT_SUPPORTED;

No, the omission is intentional. I want to repeat the check for the
root node on every call to avoid issues where this function is
called once too early.

>> -	boardstate = DEEP_PROBE_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> -	pr_info("not activated\n");
>> -	return false;
> 
> Can we please add a comment about the below if-else, e.g. referencing
> the barebox,deep-probe.rst as well?

Yes, will do for v2.

Thanks for reviewing,
Ahmad
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21              | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany         | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |




  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-28 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-28 13:14 [PATCH 1/5] common: deep-probe: inform only about lack of deep-probe support Ahmad Fatoum
2025-05-28 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] common: deep-probe: support specifying support in DT Ahmad Fatoum
2025-05-28 15:24   ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-28 15:40     ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2025-05-28 15:46       ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-28 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] treewide: dts: describe deep probe support in device tree Ahmad Fatoum
2025-05-28 15:26   ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-28 13:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: configs: enable deep probe for the most popular configs Ahmad Fatoum
2025-05-28 15:26   ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-28 13:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation: migration-2025.07.0: document CONFIG_DEEP_PROBE_DEFAULT Ahmad Fatoum
2025-05-28 15:28   ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] common: deep-probe: inform only about lack of deep-probe support Marco Felsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2bde04b0-5caa-4b06-aa00-fc7b24afb2dc@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@barebox.org \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox