From: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jonathan Borne <jborne@kalrayinc.com>,
Julian Vetter <jvetter@kalrayinc.com>,
Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@zdiv.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mci: dwcmshc-sdhci: add support for Kalray Coolidge v2 SoC eMMC controller
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:31:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46562300-8056-95c5-da6e-af247efbe62f@kalrayinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <213af923-0b5f-4a49-a982-a7a40ef1c25a@pengutronix.de>
Hello Ahmad,
On 2/29/24 17:19, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Yann,
>
> On 29.02.24 16:57, Yann Sionneau wrote:
>> Kalray Coolidge v2 SoC eMMC controller needs static tx delay tuning even
>> for basic standard or high speed modes.
>>
>> This patch also adds possibility to do some vendor specific tuning
>> in set_ios().
>> This will be needed for Coolidge v2 for >50 MHz speeds and HS200/HS400
>> modes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mci/dwcmshc-sdhci.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mci/dwcmshc-sdhci.c b/drivers/mci/dwcmshc-sdhci.c
>> index d9c51752db..5017a1f56e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mci/dwcmshc-sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mci/dwcmshc-sdhci.c
>> @@ -9,11 +9,16 @@
>> #include <dma.h>
>> #include <malloc.h>
>> #include <mci.h>
>> +#include <of_device.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>
>> #include "sdhci.h"
>>
>> +#define tx_delay_static_cfg(delay) (delay << 5)
>> +#define tx_tuning_clk_sel(delay) (delay)
>> +
>> +#define DWCMSHC_GPIO_OUT 0x34 /* offset from vendor specific area */
>> #define CARD_STATUS_MASK (0x1e00)
>> #define CARD_STATUS_TRAN (4 << 9)
>>
>> @@ -22,6 +27,13 @@ static int do_send_cmd(struct mci_host *mci, struct mci_cmd *cmd, struct mci_dat
>> struct dwcmshc_host {
>> struct mci_host mci;
>> struct sdhci sdhci;
>> + int vendor_specific_area;
>> + const struct dwcmshc_callbacks *cb;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct dwcmshc_callbacks {
>> + void (*init)(struct mci_host *mci, struct device *dev);
> Why is dev needed? There's already mci->hw_dev and mci->mci->dev
dev is not needed per se, but I thought that since the callback is used
to extend dwcmshc_mci_init() called from generic code:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/barebox/latest/source/drivers/mci/mci-core.c#L2015
Then it would be a good idea to provide the same arguments.
But I can remove it.
>
>> + void (*set_ios)(struct mci_host *mci, struct mci_ios *ios);
> You don't actually use set_ios. But I assume you intend to add in future?
> Maybe add it when it's actually needed?
Ok indeed it's for the future, in the future to support HS200/HS400 high
speed modes
vendor specific tuning (tx/rx delay lines tuning) would take place in
such callback.
>
>> +static void dwcmshc_coolidgev2_init(struct mci_host *mci, struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct dwcmshc_host *host = priv_from_mci_host(mci);
>> +
>> + // configure TX delay to set correct setup/hold for Coolidge V2
> Nite: If you are going to send v2, please change into /* */ comments
> for uniformity.
Ok!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
>
>> + sdhci_write32(&host->sdhci,
>> + host->vendor_specific_area + DWCMSHC_GPIO_OUT,
>> + tx_delay_static_cfg(0xf) | tx_tuning_clk_sel(4));
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct dwcmshc_callbacks kalray_coolidgev2_callbacks = {
>> + .init = dwcmshc_coolidgev2_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct of_device_id dwcmshc_dt_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "snps,dwcmshc-sdhci", },
>> + { .compatible = "kalray,coolidge-v2-dwcmshc-sdhci", .data = &kalray_coolidgev2_callbacks },
>> { }
>> };
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 15:56 [PATCH 1/4] mci: dwcmshc-sdhci: Remove superfluous call to sdhci_enable_v4_mode Yann Sionneau
2024-02-29 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] mci: dwcmshc-sdhci: Fix f_max computation Yann Sionneau
2024-02-29 16:19 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-02-29 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] mci: sdhci: add register define for P_VENDOR_SPECIFIC_AREA Yann Sionneau
2024-02-29 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] mci: dwcmshc-sdhci: add support for Kalray Coolidge v2 SoC eMMC controller Yann Sionneau
2024-02-29 16:19 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-02-29 16:31 ` Yann Sionneau [this message]
2024-03-01 7:49 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2024-03-04 9:18 ` (subset) [PATCH 1/4] mci: dwcmshc-sdhci: Remove superfluous call to sdhci_enable_v4_mode Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46562300-8056-95c5-da6e-af247efbe62f@kalrayinc.com \
--to=ysionneau@kalrayinc.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jborne@kalrayinc.com \
--cc=jmaselbas@zdiv.net \
--cc=jvetter@kalrayinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox