From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OevbK-0002tC-9e for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:50:39 +0000 Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so1724925wyb.36 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C532D05.7020407@dawes.za.net> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:50:29 +0200 From: Rogan Dawes MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Porting to Marvell 88F5182? To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi folks, I am trying to get a decent boot loader running on my DLink DNS323. It was shipped with a severely crippled version of U-Boot, forked from U-Boot 1.1.1, and heavily bastardized by Marvell. Recently, Albert Aribaud has added support for this chipset in U-Boot master for his LaCie ED MiniV2, which is based on the same SoC, and I am now trying to get my DLink DNS323 to work as well. I have managed to get just about everything to work, except for the flash part, a Spansion S29GL064M90TFIR4 device. Unfortunately, there seems to be some strange connections going on, and the standard U-Boot CFI code does not recognise it. I see that there has been a lot of changes to the BareBox CFI code since it was forked from U-Boot 1.2.0, and I was wondering if maybe that code would be more successful. So, the question then: Given a working board definition in U-Boot master for an ARM926EJ-S based Soc, how difficult is it to port this to current BareBox master? Thanks! Rogan _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox