From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OfBIZ-0003s8-16 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:36:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4C5418BF.3000301@eukrea.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:36:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C532D05.7020407@dawes.za.net> <4C540747.7000602@dawes.za.net> In-Reply-To: <4C540747.7000602@dawes.za.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Porting to Marvell 88F5182? To: Rogan Dawes Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" Hi Rogan, Le 31/07/2010 13:21, Rogan Dawes a =E9crit : > Since I'd be chainloading barebox from the existing U-Boot, which does > support loadb and bootm, it probably makes the most sense initially to > just skip the lowlevel init, and build a minimal ARM second stage, and > wrap it in a u-boot image, I think. > > I tried using the at91sam9263ek_defconfig, and unsetting > CONFIG_MACH_DO_LOWLEVEL_INIT. that won't work : you don't have the same memory mapping so barebox has = little chance to be in ram on your platform and, even if it was in RAM = as soon as it will poll for the serial port tx empty bit, you will stay = blocked because your serial port is not the same as the at91sam9263. Eric _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox