From: Jürgen <J.Kilb@phytec.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: v2013.02.0 phyCORE-OMAP4 MLO to big
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:30:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5135F36E.2090401@phytec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFC6CD83ED.4FD2D09A-ONC1257B25.0047F4F9-C1257B25.00480A80@phytec.de>
On 11.02.2013 Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:22:09PM +0100, Jan Weitzel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> with the release v2013.02.0 the MLO gets so bit, that it eats the boot
>> information in the SRAM.
>>
>> nm --size-sort
>>
>> ...
>> 00000630 D nand_flash_ids
>> 000008c0 t mci_probe
>> 00000c00 b gpio_desc
>> 00001400 b files
>>
>> If I remove GPIOLIB from MLO it work again. Maybe setting MAX_FILES
>> down or find a dynamic way for the big arrays is a better solution.
>> Any Ideas?
> Could you link the MLO to SDRAM instead?
Hi Sascha, we have tried as you suggested and it doesn't work without
changes...
We found two things:
1.) There is early code which is not relocatable.
We solved this by adding -fPIC to the CPPFLAGS.
But I think, this is also solved with your patch
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2013-March/013366.html
2.) The TEXTBASE is passed to the signGP tool, which is wrong if
TEXT_BASE is different from the executing address before relocating.
In our case TEXT_BASE would be 0x86000000 but the MLO is executed
in internal SRAM at 0x40300000.
So I would suggest to create a config option like OMAP_IFT_BASE which
can be passed to the signGP tool and is set to 0x40300000 per default..
What do you think?
Jürgen
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 15:22 Jan Weitzel
2013-02-11 10:04 ` Sascha Hauer
[not found] ` <OFC6CD83ED.4FD2D09A-ONC1257B25.0047F4F9-C1257B25.00480A80@phytec.de>
2013-03-05 13:30 ` Jürgen [this message]
2013-03-07 8:18 ` Antwort: " Sascha Hauer
2013-03-07 11:19 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5135F36E.2090401@phytec.de \
--to=j.kilb@phytec.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox