From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from teledigit.eu ([195.56.148.37]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Z7OSN-0006ow-Uh for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:41:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.42.238] ([176.63.203.49]:59306) by teledigit.eu with [XMail 1.27 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:41:19 +0200 Message-ID: <558961C0.2090005@teledigit.eu> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:40:16 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Gy=F6rgy_K=F6vesdi?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5588272F.9010803@eutecus.com> <1435047176.25607.3.camel@pengutronix.de> <55894326.5000107@teledigit.eu> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Compiling barebox for newest Yocto/meta-freescale To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, > You better ask in some Yocto-specific mailing list, this isn't really > the problem of Barebox anymore. :-) The soft-float option might come > from one of your inherited configuration files. I am completely confused now, because Yocto guys said that the problem is in Barebox... :-) At least i can compile thousands of recipes on Yocto, currently Barebox is the only one having this issue. I spent a lot of time debugging this problem in the recent days and i see the float abi is set to hard in the bitbake environment, and the soft float is not even supported by gcc (that is the problem). Currently i blame the kernel build system used by Barebox about setting soft float abi. > Soft-Float is definitely not optimal for the i.MX6, because this one > has FPU commands. I agree. Regards Gyorgy Kovesdi _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox