From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [PATCH 2/3] FPGA: add a programming command
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 23:27:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <572C7A49-B2B8-4DD1-B9A7-2FCE0444356B@jcrosoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383835020.4120.2.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de>
On Nov 7, 2013, at 10:37 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2013, 15:37 +0100 schrieb Jean-Christophe
> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
>> On 12:09 Thu 07 Nov , Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:04:56AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I really do not like it
>>>>
>>>> we need to have an API to load firmware same a Linux
>>>
>>> The firmware loading mechanism in Linux is driven by the driver
>>> requesting a firmware. This is appropriate for WiFi drivers which can't
>>> continue without a firmware. For FPGAs which can be loaded, unloaded, or
>>> even partially loaded, it's the user that should trigger firmware
>>> loading, not the driver.
>>>
>>> Also, in barebox a user should decide if and when a firmware is loaded.
>>> We have cases where a single board requires different Firmwares
>>> depending on bootstrapping. In this case You don't want to have fixed
>>> firmware names.
>>>
>>> So no, the Linux Firmware model is not suitable for barebox (it sucks
>>> for Linux aswell in many cases).
>>
>> and command is horrible as you need to known the protocol which you do not
>> care
>>
>> you just need to known the fpga device and firmware you want to use
>>
>> then the fpga driver will handle
>>
> Did you take the time to read the patches?
>
> From a user perspective you only specify which FPGA you want to program
> and tell the command which firmware file to use. The protocol and other
> lowlevel stuff is taken care of in the handler.
yes I did but the issue is that you need to use a command instead just simply
set a parameter to the fpga device
that why I hate the idea of command you use the device to set the firmware you want
Best Regards,
J.
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 14:24 [RFC] FPGA: add a simple framework for firmware programming Juergen Beisert
2013-11-06 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] FPGA: add a simple programming handler framework Juergen Beisert
2013-11-06 14:36 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-11-06 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] FPGA: add a programming command Juergen Beisert
2013-11-07 10:04 ` [SPAM] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-07 11:09 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-11-07 14:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-07 14:37 ` Lucas Stach
2013-11-07 15:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2013-11-08 8:22 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-11-06 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] FPGA: provide a handler to program ALTERA FPGAs Juergen Beisert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=572C7A49-B2B8-4DD1-B9A7-2FCE0444356B@jcrosoft.com \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox