From: gianluca <gianlucarenzi@eurek.it>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Barebox 2020.01.0 and Device Tree from Linux Kernel 5.4
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:32:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f02d95b-418e-f0c0-68c6-29d7d9ab0db6@eurek.it> (raw)
Hello list!
I was wondering if the device tree from (latest) Linux Kernel can be
used when building Barebox 2020.01.0 for iMX6 compatible custom board.
For sure the include path and other stuff are quite different (kernel
and barebox), so I am pretty sure it will fail to build with some sort
of "foreign" device-tree. Another issue, will be the drivers to have
full access from Barebox-Point-Of-View. If the device-tree properties
and compatible strings are quite different, Barebox will fail to
activating/probing/using the internal driver.
So I am asking:
There is a "official" way to manage those differencies?
Am I forced to use TWO device-tree dts files (almost identical each
other) ???
It seems it is like re-inventing the wheel...
I think this procedure can be used with ALL supported boards present in
barebox source tree.
Actually I am using a slightly modified device-tree for my boards from
kernel, then adapted to be compiled for Barebox.
Some nodes are "disabled" by default as status, so Barebox will activate
them when probing the real-hardware.
I would like to keep my code to activate/deactivate device-tree drivers,
but without modifying the Kernel device-tree each time when I do a
Kernel update.
Any hint will be very accepted.
Regards,
--
Eurek s.r.l. |
Electronic Engineering | http://www.eurek.it
via Celletta 8/B, 40026 Imola, Italy | Phone: +39-(0)542-609120
p.iva 00690621206 - c.f. 04020030377 | Fax: +39-(0)542-609212
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-24 15:32 gianluca [this message]
2020-01-24 16:13 ` Ahmad Fatoum
[not found] ` <8f731e2b-9c11-d183-a660-e0a7ea621074@eurek.it>
2020-01-28 12:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f02d95b-418e-f0c0-68c6-29d7d9ab0db6@eurek.it \
--to=gianlucarenzi@eurek.it \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox