mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: change r2pro dts to public hw version (was "Board code with 2 dts" )
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 19:00:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f97de95-9fc0-11ba-c06a-d4f38f41d521@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-76ce1194-1e72-4cce-81ae-529407eb0ae0-1649415827026@3c-app-gmx-bap48>

Hi Frank

Am 08.04.22 um 13:03 schrieb Frank Wunderlich:
> Hi,
>
> have now the new board, but cannot get the gmac working in barebox. In linux i have it working
>
> https://github.com/frank-w/BPI-R2-4.14/blob/5.17-main/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts#L235
>
> changed the dts in barebox to same values, but cannot get it working
>
> https://github.com/frank-w/barebox-r2pro/blob/r2pro/arch/arm/dts/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts#L123
>
> i see both interfaces, but it looks like the phy (rtl8211F) is not working in barebox

The rgmii configuration is may be wrong.

phy-mode = "rgmii" looks not realistic. The "rgmii" is only possible if rgmii clock line on this
board is about 20cm longer compared to rgmii data lines. I doubt it is the case :)

So, it looks like the delay was added as separate property for the MAC. Without reading manual for
this chip I can't interprete this values looks somehow strange:
	tx_delay = <0x4f>;
	rx_delay = <0x0f>;

Normally delays are equal for both directions.
Best practice is: MAC  do not adds delays, PHY will do it (PHY driver should be enabled)

> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ dhcp eth1
> eth1: 1000Mbps full duplex link detected
> eth1: 1000Mbps full duplex link detected
> WARNING: eth1: No MAC address set. Using random address e2:3c:a9:08:b8:c8
> T T T T T T T T T T T eth1: link down
> T dhcp: Network is down
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ eth1: 1000Mbps full duplex link detected
>
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ devinfo eth1
> Parent: fe010000.ethernet@fe010000.of
> Parameters:
> ethaddr: e2:3c:a9:08:b8:c8 (type: MAC)
> gateway: 0.0.0.0 (type: ipv4)
> ipaddr: 0.0.0.0 (type: ipv4)
> linux.bootargs: (type: string)
> linux.devname: (type: string)
> mode: dhcp (type: enum) (values: "dhcp", "static", "disabled")
> netmask: 0.0.0.0 (type: ipv4)
> serverip: (type: string)
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ eth1.mode=static
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ eth1.netmask=255.255.255.0
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ eth1.ipaddr=192.168.0.18
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ devinfo eth1
> Parent: fe010000.ethernet@fe010000.of
> Parameters:
> ethaddr: e2:3c:a9:08:b8:c8 (type: MAC)
> gateway: 0.0.0.0 (type: ipv4)
> ipaddr: 192.168.0.18 (type: ipv4)
> linux.bootargs: (type: string)
> linux.devname: (type: string)
> mode: static (type: enum) (values: "dhcp", "static", "disabled")
> netmask: 255.255.255.0 (type: ipv4)
> serverip: (type: string)
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ global.net.nameserver=192.168.0.10
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ ifup eth1
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/ ping 192.168.0.10
> T T T T T ping failed: Connection timed out
> barebox@BPI R2PRO:/
>
> devinfo without device shows me this:
>
> `-- fe010000.ethernet@fe010000.of
>    `-- miibus0
>      `-- mdio0-phy00
>        `-- 0x00000000-0x0000003f ( 64 Bytes): /dev/mdio0-phy00
>    `-- eth1
> `-- fe2a0000.ethernet@fe2a0000.of
>    `-- miibus1
>    `-- eth0
>
> any idea how to trace the problem down?
>
> regards Frank
>
>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. März 2022 um 10:03 Uhr
>> Von: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> An: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>
>> Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
>> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Board code with 2 dts
>>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 23.03.22 08:47, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> thanks for your fast and detailed answer.
>>> afaik vendor have not changed the saradc-detection (because v00 was not public), so v00 has same value as v1.0 and i cannot detect difference there. Maybe there is another way to detect (maybe based on gmac or any hardware-change), but for now i used last option you've mentioned (second entry function).
>>
>> If it's just pre-production HW, it's not worth it to dynamically detect, I agree.
>>
>>> Have it implemented like kontron-samx6i (both dts currently same), it compiles, can you take a quick look if i did it right?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/frank-w/barebox-r2pro/commit/deaf7a8eed7575e35c17807aa0a432363122b033
>>
>> Looks ok to me. Nitpick: Using __dtb_z_ instead of __dtb_ and selecting ARM_USE_COMPRESSED_DTB
>> will decrease barebox size a bit.
>>
>>> this is not intended to be upstreamed, but for me to fix upstream with v1 config (when i get the board) and still using v00 board.
>>
>> If v00 is not publicly available, it would be nice if you could replace the existing
>> v00 support with v01 once you can test it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ahmad
>>
>>>
>>> regards Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. März 2022 um 18:34 Uhr
>>>> Von: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>>>> An: frank-w@public-files.de, barebox@lists.infradead.org
>>>> Betreff: Re: Board code with 2 dts
>>>>
>>>> Hello Frank,
>>>>
>>>> On 22.03.22 18:23, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I get information that new hardware revision of bpi-r2 pro has some differences to the version i upstreamed. Is it possible to add a new dts and use same board code?
>>>>>
>>>>> How can i choose between the 2 dts on build (kconfig option)?
>>>>
>>>> In any case, don't add a new Kconfig option. The existing one suffices.
>>>>
>>>>> Afaik the name of dtb is hardcoded in lowlevel.c [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> Differences are iodomains (not defined in barebox,but linux) and gmac-config (gmacs swapped and different settings).
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently i have not yet the new board for testing,but then i want to send patches for linux and barebox.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/tree/arch/arm/boards/rockchip-rk3568-bpi-r2pro/lowlevel.c#n24
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to detect which board is being used?
>>>> If so, best practice is to have barebox the same image for both
>>>> and detect board type at runtime.
>>>> Here's an example doing it in lowlevel.c:
>>>> arch/arm/boards/stm32mp15xx-dkx/lowlevel.c
>>>>
>>>> If you need more barebox infrastructure than what's available in the bootloader
>>>> to detect board type, you could e.g. rewrite gmac-config in barebox board code
>>>> after detection.
>>>>
>>>> If there is no way to dynamically detect which board variant barebox is running
>>>> on, just duplicate the entry point in the same file and change just the device
>>>> tree. Then extend images/Makefile.rockchip to reference the new entry point
>>>> and barebox build will generate an image for each board. See for example:
>>>>
>>>> arch/arm/boards/kontron-samx6i/lowlevel.c
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ahmad
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
>> Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox


--
Regards,
Oleksij

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-08 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-22 17:23 Board code with 2 dts Frank Wunderlich
2022-03-22 17:34 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-23  7:47   ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-03-23  8:03     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-04-08 11:03       ` change r2pro dts to public hw version (was "Board code with 2 dts" ) Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-08 17:00         ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2022-04-08 17:19           ` Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-09  8:04             ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-04-09  8:35               ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-09 16:01                 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-04-09 17:08                   ` Trent Piepho
2022-04-10  7:41                     ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-04-10  8:28                       ` Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-10  9:28                       ` Trent Piepho
2022-04-10 15:00                         ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-04-10 20:36                           ` Trent Piepho
2022-04-11  9:00                             ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f97de95-9fc0-11ba-c06a-d4f38f41d521@rempel-privat.de \
    --to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox