From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com ([209.85.219.220]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NMgqY-0003jf-LO for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:54:47 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so2045047ewy.20 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:54:40 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Korsgaard References: <20091221113052.GG15126@pengutronix.de> <87hbrkzh9w.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:54:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Robert P. J. Day's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:47:48 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <87d428zgn5.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] commands: Remove reference to non-existent CONFIG_CMD_I2C. To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: "U-Boot Version 2 (barebox)" >>>>> "Robert" == Robert P J Day writes: Hi, >> I could see basic I2C access being useful for debugging (of >> non-eeprom devices). Robert> i was imagining the same thing, but since there's no such Robert> support at the moment, there's little value in leaving that Robert> config variable there. Agreed. Robert> personally, i'd rather that didn't happen, just because it's Robert> easier to track paches if they're logically complete and Robert> coherent. in short, when the time comes to add an "i2c" Robert> command, we can put everything back in in one patch. sound Robert> reasonable? Sure. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox