From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Pf6JW-0003jq-QG for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:49:20 +0000 Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so5755148wyf.36 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Korsgaard References: <1295259766-19301-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1295259766-19301-4-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <201101171159.31154.jbe@pengutronix.de> <201101180949.35371.marc@cpdesign.com.au> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:48:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201101180949.35371.marc@cpdesign.com.au> (Marc Reilly's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:49:35 +1100") Message-ID: <87y66i8xel.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM i.MX28 tx28: use a fixed framebuffer address To: Marc Reilly Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org >>>>> "Marc" == Marc Reilly writes: Hi, Marc> Purely out of interest, what is the advantage/necessity for Marc> having the frame buffer at a fixed address? Presumably to be able to reuse the buffer in Linux for flicker free booting. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox