From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:25:37 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wwx9c-0059MK-2v for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:25:37 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8042C2006E0 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=GFtlRlM2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=9i9D/G7Xp+1ToJjGALouuDuox6gcn1GHKlbnptzoVSc=; b=GFtlRlM20bB0fKT/3QbYntNDX7 YWxyuRqhJ8V2pvTb4Ack7gOn3U6YFbSJOP7TouqJpQrOtI76+qvtQ00ZED68OSt8IMYM+E+9Ojgf2 PUFIulze5bKIlZRLUhYh5VQqPTP4vZznmnSPTp80QO+MeV98PKe51A15a7vCD0Zl3mV+ucHpsYJWC Puy8YMFAnrQxFVz2tUk1zBX6ZRZa6ZkEmexEOLy8qB4NHx7ryf/jSAIVF/LRtQceb5XglGfJtCXvG OrGZBpjZ2oywf/L3ciMRT0Mgb1V7OzUqVQaaGpi7BAv/Hha29ICw5ocBmcx4vXwht9uFARmsgEWMH LCdLHFug==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wwx8T-0000000B34Y-12S2; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:24:25 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wwx8H-0000000B2uA-3uz6 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:24:23 +0000 Received: from [0.0.0.0] (ptz.office.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:900:1d::77]) (Authenticated sender: ske@pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1EBE202234; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <88983a20-8a30-4462-ac15-997f0aa3d086@pengutronix.de> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:24:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PBL: constructor fixes To: Sascha Hauer Cc: "open list:BAREBOX" , Ahmad Fatoum References: <20260819-next-v1-0-c1a1a8b44d02@pengutronix.de> <0c26bfcc-deb4-400c-aa46-e20f839d4194@pengutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Stefan Kerkmann In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260820_002414_179407_178E6759 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.52 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Sascha, On 8/20/26 09:18, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On 2026-08-20 09:14, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 8/19/26 17:01, Sascha Hauer wrote: >>> On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> O [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: 7i1q9u1n81rnixiqqbagzpxij7uqz8xo X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.51 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2607:7c80:54:3::133:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a0a:edc0:0:900:1d::77:received]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FORWARDED(0.00)[barebox@lists.infradead.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8042C2006E0 Hi Sascha, On 8/20/26 09:18, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On 2026-08-20 09:14, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 8/19/26 17:01, Sascha Hauer wrote: >>> On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 8/19/26 4:12 PM, Stefan Kerkmann wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Kerkmann >>>>> --- >>>>> Stefan Kerkmann (2): >>>>> ARM/ARM64/RISC-V: pbl: guard constructor support >>>>> ARM64: setup_c: abi safe link register storage >>>> >>>> if these are applied after what's in next, we would have intermittent >>>> breakage when doing a bisect right? >>>> >>>> I would suggest either turning these into fixups or just resend the >>>> whole series. >>> >>> I just squashed them into the original commit. But next time, yes, you >>> can send --fixup patches for patches in next. >>> >> >> Thanks, I missed the bisectability requirement for this series. For the setup_c >> patch I actually send an amend patch to include it in the original series with: >> >> git send-email HEAD^ --to="Sascha Hauer " --to="\"open >> list:BAREBOX\" " --cc="Stefan Kerkmann >> " >> --in-reply-to="<20260817-feature-pbl-get-time-ns-v3-2-9874c1438855@pengutronix.de>" >> >> But it maybe wasn't picked up by b4 at the time the original merge happened? > > It picked it up. > Huh, I was fairly sure that I enrolled the series on top of next after the merge and the patch applied, strange. But good to know that it worked! > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > > Best regards, Stefan -- Pengutronix e.K. | Stefan Kerkmann | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-128 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |