From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: "Enrico Jörns" <ejo@pengutronix.de>, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: bootchooser: fix grammar and wording for 'attempts_locked'
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:48:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89717258-4910-4b80-a727-e15bf55286fb@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260220085130.1326621-1-ejo@pengutronix.de>
On 2/20/26 9:50 AM, Enrico Jörns wrote:
> * 'variable in the bootstate' is undefined -> replace
> * fix and rephrase 'use case' sentence
> * fix and rephrase 'trade-off' sentence
> * Add missing period after 'avoid this behavior'
> * Avoid unclear 'to boot if any'
> * fix typo, remove excess whitespace
>
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Jörns <ejo@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Documentation/user/bootchooser.rst | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/user/bootchooser.rst b/Documentation/user/bootchooser.rst
> index 360305e92e..b38bae2c23 100644
> --- a/Documentation/user/bootchooser.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/user/bootchooser.rst
> @@ -88,21 +88,23 @@ variable.
>
> Alternatively, counting down the remaining attempts can be disabled by
> locking bootchooser boot attempts.
> -This is done by defining a (32-bit) ``attempts_locked`` variable in the
> -bootstate and setting its value to ``1`` (usually from userspace).
> +This is done by defining a (32-bit) ``attempts_locked`` run-time variable and
> +setting its value to ``1`` (usually from userspace).
>
> -In scenarios where the system is rebootet too frequently (after the ``remaining_attempts``
> -counter is decremented, but before it got incremented again after a successful boot) and falls
> -back to the other boot target, the ``attempts_locked`` variable can be used to avoid this behavior
> +In scenarios where the system is rebooted too frequently (after the ``remaining_attempts``
> +counter is decremented, but before it got incremented again after a successful boot), it can unintentionally fall
> +back to the other boot target.
> +The ``attempts_locked`` variable can be used to avoid this behavior.
> Bootchooser is prevented from decrementing the ``remaining_attempts`` counter and falling back
> -to the other target. It comes with the trade-off that a slot, that becomes broken
> -over time, it won't be detected anymore and will be booted indefinitely.
> +to the other target. It comes with the trade-off that a slot that becomes broken
> +over time will no longer be detected as such and will be booted indefinitely.
>
> The variable affects all targets, is optional and its absence is
> interpreted as ``0``, meaning that attempts are decremented normally.
>
> -The ``attempts_locked`` value does not influence the decision on which target
> -to boot if any, only whether to decrement the attempts when booting.
> +The ``attempts_locked`` variable does not influence which boot target is
> +selected, only whether its ``remaining_attempts`` counter is decremented when
> +booting.
>
> If :ref:`global.bootchooser.retry <magicvar_global_bootchooser_retry>`
> is enabled (set to ``1``), the bootchooser
> @@ -134,12 +136,12 @@ on the :ref:`reset reason <reset_reason>` (i.e. != WDG) using the
> This will reset the ``remaining_attempts`` counter of the *last chosen* slot to
> its default value (``reset_attempts``).
>
> -Another option is to use ``attempts_locked``. Normally this should be controlled from
> +An additional option is to use ``attempts_locked``. Normally this should be controlled from
> Linux userspace using the *barebox-state* tool, i.e.::
>
> - barebox-state -s bootstate.attempts_locked=1
> + barebox-state -s bootstate.attempts_locked=1
>
> -It can also be locked via the :ref:`bootchooser command <command_bootchooser>`::
> +It can also be locked from barebox via the :ref:`bootchooser command <command_bootchooser>`::
>
> bootchooser -l
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 8:50 Enrico Jörns
2026-02-20 8:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: bootchooser: move attempts locking to own section Enrico Jörns
2026-02-23 8:49 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2026-02-23 8:48 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2026-02-23 9:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: bootchooser: fix grammar and wording for 'attempts_locked' Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89717258-4910-4b80-a727-e15bf55286fb@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ejo@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox