From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] of: support of_ensure_probed for top-level machine device
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:46:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ab39746-bd15-6b72-f544-df2c12f971bc@wolfvision.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230210165353.3601175-2-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Hi Ahmad,
On 2/10/23 17:53, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Creation of a machine device for the top-level node has special casing
> in of_probe(). Export of_platform_device_create_root(), so it's possible
> to ensure probe of the machine device. This is required when doing
> of_devices_ensure_probed_by_dev_id with the machine compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
This patch breaks my board code that calls
of_device_ensure_probed_by_alias() in the probe() of the board driver.
The function always returns -ENODEV.
Do I have to adjust my (downstream) board code somehow?
Thanks and best regards,
Michael
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - new patch to facilitate patch 3/4
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 10 +++++++---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 2 +-
> include/of.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 1221cd316cdf..7ba0655401cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2512,13 +2512,13 @@ static int of_probe_memory(void)
> }
> mem_initcall(of_probe_memory);
>
> -static void of_platform_device_create_root(struct device_node *np)
> +struct device *of_platform_device_create_root(struct device_node *np)
> {
> static struct device *dev;
> int ret;
>
> if (dev)
> - return;
> + return dev;
>
> dev = xzalloc(sizeof(*dev));
> dev->id = DEVICE_ID_SINGLE;
> @@ -2526,8 +2526,12 @@ static void of_platform_device_create_root(struct device_node *np)
> dev_set_name(dev, "machine");
>
> ret = platform_device_register(dev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> free_device(dev);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> +
> + return dev;
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id reserved_mem_matches[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 69f9ddec50ca..11cde8924f94 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct device *of_device_create_on_demand(struct device_node *np)
>
> parent = of_get_parent(np);
> if (!parent)
> - return NULL;
> + return of_platform_device_create_root(np);
>
> if (!np->dev && parent->dev) {
> ret = device_detect(parent->dev);
> diff --git a/include/of.h b/include/of.h
> index 1a38774615a4..63c90255cd64 100644
> --- a/include/of.h
> +++ b/include/of.h
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ extern void of_platform_device_dummy_drv(struct device *dev);
> extern int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root,
> const struct of_device_id *matches,
> struct device *parent);
> +extern struct device *of_platform_device_create_root(struct device_node *np);
> extern struct device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np);
> extern struct device *of_device_enable_and_register(struct device_node *np);
> extern struct device *of_device_enable_and_register_by_name(const char *name);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 16:53 [PATCH v2 1/4] of: base: factor out of_merge_nodes from of_copy_node Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-10 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] of: support of_ensure_probed for top-level machine device Ahmad Fatoum
2023-03-10 14:46 ` Michael Riesch [this message]
2023-03-10 16:19 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-03-13 7:05 ` Michael Riesch
2023-03-13 14:43 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-10 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] boards: qemu-virt: ensure board driver probe at postcore_initcall level Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-10 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] boards: qemu-virt: support passing in FIT public key Ahmad Fatoum
2023-02-10 17:32 ` Jan Lübbe
2023-02-13 8:45 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-02-17 13:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-03-09 12:47 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-03-10 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of: base: factor out of_merge_nodes from of_copy_node Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ab39746-bd15-6b72-f544-df2c12f971bc@wolfvision.net \
--to=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox