* [PATCH v2] PWM: imx: pwm-imx-tpm: Add driver support
@ 2025-01-28 15:14 Michael Grzeschik
2025-01-28 15:27 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Grzeschik @ 2025-01-28 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Import the Linux v6.12 state of the driver to enable barebox control of PWM
LEDs, backlights and other peripherals.
This has been tested on the IMX93.
Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
---
v1 -> v2:
- dropped the check for xzalloc return
- check npwm for ARRAY_SIZE(tpm->pwm)
- use xasprintf instead of basprintf
drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 6 +
drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c | 408 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 415 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index eb04f92c6f..85cde63bf6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ config PWM_IMX
help
This enables PWM support for Freescale i.MX SoCs
+config PWM_TPM
+ bool "i.MX TPM Support"
+ depends on ARCH_IMX || COMPILE_TEST
+ help
+ This enables PWM support for Freescale i.MX SoCs
+
config PWM_MXS
bool "i.MXs PWM Support"
depends on ARCH_MXS
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index 4adc083e6c..d0cd4318e8 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM) += core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_PXA) += pxa_pwm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ATMEL) += pwm-atmel.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX) += pwm-imx.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TPM) += pwm-imx-tpm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MXS) += pwm-mxs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STM32) += pwm-stm32.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP) += pwm-rockchip.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e88f618608
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,408 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright 2018-2019 NXP.
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - The TPM counter and period counter are shared between
+ * multiple channels, so all channels should use same period
+ * settings.
+ * - Changes to polarity cannot be latched at the time of the
+ * next period start.
+ * - Changing period and duty cycle together isn't atomic,
+ * with the wrong timing it might happen that a period is
+ * produced with old duty cycle but new period settings.
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/time.h>
+#include <linux/log2.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <clock.h>
+#include <of.h>
+#include <pwm.h>
+#include <init.h>
+#include <linux/barebox-wrapper.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_PARAM 0x4
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_GLOBAL 0x8
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_SC 0x10
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CNT 0x14
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD 0x18
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(n) (0x20 + (n) * 0x8)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnV(n) (0x24 + (n) * 0x8)
+
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_PARAM_CHAN GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_PS GENMASK(2, 0)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CMOD GENMASK(4, 3)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CMOD_INC_EVERY_CLK FIELD_PREP(PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CMOD, 1)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CPWMS BIT(5)
+
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_CHF BIT(7)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_MSB BIT(5)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_MSA BIT(4)
+
+/*
+ * The reference manual describes this field as two separate bits. The
+ * semantic of the two bits isn't orthogonal though, so they are treated
+ * together as a 2-bit field here.
+ */
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS GENMASK(3, 2)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS_INVERSED FIELD_PREP(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS, 1)
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS_NORMAL FIELD_PREP(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS, 2)
+
+
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD_WIDTH 16
+#define PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD_MOD GENMASK(PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD_WIDTH - 1, 0)
+
+struct imx_tpm_pwm;
+
+struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip {
+ struct pwm_chip chip;
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm *tpm;
+ u32 user_count;
+ u32 enable_count;
+ u32 real_period;
+};
+
+struct imx_tpm_pwm {
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip pwm[8];
+ struct clk *clk;
+ void __iomem *base;
+};
+
+struct imx_tpm_pwm_param {
+ u8 prescale;
+ u32 mod;
+ u32 val;
+};
+
+#define to_imx_tpm_pwm_chip(_chip) container_of(_chip, struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip, chip)
+
+/*
+ * This function determines for a given pwm_state *state that a consumer
+ * might request the pwm_state *real_state that eventually is implemented
+ * by the hardware and the necessary register values (in *p) to achieve
+ * this.
+ */
+static int pwm_imx_tpm_round_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_param *p,
+ struct pwm_state *real_state,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpm = to_imx_tpm_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 rate, prescale, period_count, clock_unit;
+ u64 tmp;
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(tpm->tpm->clk);
+ tmp = (u64)state->period * rate;
+ clock_unit = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ if (clock_unit <= PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD_MOD)
+ prescale = 0;
+ else
+ prescale = ilog2(clock_unit) + 1 - PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD_WIDTH;
+
+ if ((!FIELD_FIT(PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_PS, prescale)))
+ return -ERANGE;
+ p->prescale = prescale;
+
+ period_count = (clock_unit + ((1 << prescale) >> 1)) >> prescale;
+ if (period_count == 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ p->mod = period_count - 1;
+
+ /* calculate real period HW can support */
+ tmp = (u64)period_count << prescale;
+ tmp *= NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ real_state->period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, rate);
+
+ /*
+ * if eventually the PWM output is inactive, either
+ * duty cycle is 0 or status is disabled, need to
+ * make sure the output pin is inactive.
+ */
+ if (!state->enabled)
+ real_state->duty_cycle = 0;
+ else
+ real_state->duty_cycle = state->duty_cycle;
+
+ tmp = (u64)p->mod * real_state->duty_cycle;
+ p->val = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp, real_state->period);
+
+ real_state->polarity = state->polarity;
+ real_state->enabled = state->enabled;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pwm_imx_tpm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+ struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpm = to_imx_tpm_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 rate, val, prescale;
+ u64 tmp;
+
+ /* get period */
+ state->period = tpm->real_period;
+
+ /* get duty cycle */
+ rate = clk_get_rate(tpm->tpm->clk);
+ val = readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_SC);
+ prescale = FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_PS, val);
+ tmp = readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnV(chip->id));
+ tmp = (tmp << prescale) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, rate);
+
+ /* get polarity */
+ val = readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(chip->id));
+ if ((val & PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS) == PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS_INVERSED)
+ state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
+ else
+ /*
+ * Assume reserved values (2b00 and 2b11) to yield
+ * normal polarity.
+ */
+ state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+
+ /* get channel status */
+ state->enabled = FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS, val) ? true : false;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* this function is supposed to be called with mutex hold */
+static int pwm_imx_tpm_apply_hw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_param *p,
+ struct pwm_state *state,
+ struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpm = to_imx_tpm_pwm_chip(chip);
+ bool period_update = false;
+ bool duty_update = false;
+ u32 val, cmod, cur_prescale;
+ unsigned long timeout_ms;
+ struct pwm_state c;
+ uint64_t start;
+
+ if (state->period != tpm->real_period) {
+ /*
+ * TPM counter is shared by multiple channels, so
+ * prescale and period can NOT be modified when
+ * there are multiple channels in use with different
+ * period settings.
+ */
+ if (tpm->user_count > 1)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ val = readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_SC);
+ cmod = FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CMOD, val);
+ cur_prescale = FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_PS, val);
+ if (cmod && cur_prescale != p->prescale)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ /* set TPM counter prescale */
+ val &= ~PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_PS;
+ val |= FIELD_PREP(PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_PS, p->prescale);
+ writel(val, tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_SC);
+
+ /*
+ * set period count:
+ * if the PWM is disabled (CMOD[1:0] = 2b00), then MOD register
+ * is updated when MOD register is written.
+ *
+ * if the PWM is enabled (CMOD[1:0] ≠ 2b00), the period length
+ * is latched into hardware when the next period starts.
+ */
+ writel(p->mod, tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD);
+ tpm->real_period = state->period;
+ period_update = true;
+ }
+
+ pwm_imx_tpm_get_state(chip, pwm, &c);
+
+ /* polarity is NOT allowed to be changed if PWM is active */
+ if (c.enabled && c.polarity != state->polarity)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ if (state->duty_cycle != c.duty_cycle) {
+ /*
+ * set channel value:
+ * if the PWM is disabled (CMOD[1:0] = 2b00), then CnV register
+ * is updated when CnV register is written.
+ *
+ * if the PWM is enabled (CMOD[1:0] ≠ 2b00), the duty length
+ * is latched into hardware when the next period starts.
+ */
+ writel(p->val, tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnV(chip->id));
+ duty_update = true;
+ }
+
+ /* make sure MOD & CnV registers are updated */
+ if (period_update || duty_update) {
+ start = get_time_ns();
+ timeout_ms = (tpm->real_period / NSEC_PER_MSEC + 1);
+ while (readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_MOD) != p->mod
+ || readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnV(chip->id))
+ != p->val) {
+ if (is_timeout(start, timeout_ms))
+ return -ETIME;
+ cpu_relax();
+ } udelay(10);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * polarity settings will enabled/disable output status
+ * immediately, so if the channel is disabled, need to
+ * make sure MSA/MSB/ELS are set to 0 which means channel
+ * disabled.
+ */
+ val = readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(chip->id));
+ val &= ~(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS | PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_MSA |
+ PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_MSB);
+ if (state->enabled) {
+ /*
+ * set polarity (for edge-aligned PWM modes)
+ *
+ * ELS[1:0] = 2b10 yields normal polarity behaviour,
+ * ELS[1:0] = 2b01 yields inversed polarity.
+ * The other values are reserved.
+ */
+ val |= PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_MSB;
+ val |= (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) ?
+ PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS_NORMAL :
+ PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS_INVERSED;
+ }
+ writel(val, tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(chip->id));
+
+ /* control the counter status */
+ if (state->enabled != c.enabled) {
+ val = readl(tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_SC);
+ if (state->enabled) {
+ if (++tpm->enable_count == 1)
+ val |= PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CMOD_INC_EVERY_CLK;
+ } else {
+ if (--tpm->enable_count == 0)
+ val &= ~PWM_IMX_TPM_SC_CMOD;
+ }
+ writel(val, tpm->tpm->base + PWM_IMX_TPM_SC);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pwm_imx_tpm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+ struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_param param;
+ struct pwm_state real_state;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pwm_imx_tpm_round_state(chip, ¶m, &real_state, state);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = pwm_imx_tpm_apply_hw(chip, ¶m, &real_state, pwm);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int pwm_imx_tpm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpm = to_imx_tpm_pwm_chip(chip);
+
+ tpm->user_count++;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void pwm_imx_tpm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpm = to_imx_tpm_pwm_chip(chip);
+
+ tpm->user_count--;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops imx_tpm_pwm_ops = {
+ .request = pwm_imx_tpm_request,
+ .free = pwm_imx_tpm_free,
+ .apply = pwm_imx_tpm_apply,
+};
+
+static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct pwm_chip *chip;
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm *tpm;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int npwm;
+ u32 val;
+ int i;
+
+ base = dev_platform_ioremap_resource(dev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ clk = clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk),
+ "failed to get PWM clock\n");
+
+ /* get number of channels */
+ val = readl(base + PWM_IMX_TPM_PARAM);
+ npwm = FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_PARAM_CHAN, val);
+
+ tpm = xzalloc(sizeof(*tpm));
+
+ if (npwm > ARRAY_SIZE(tpm->pwm))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk),
+ "hardware has more channels then supported\n");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < npwm; i++) {
+ struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpmc = &tpm->pwm[i];
+
+ chip = &tpmc->chip;
+
+ tpmc->tpm = tpm;
+ tpmc->tpm->base = base;
+ tpmc->tpm->clk = clk;
+
+ chip->ops = &imx_tpm_pwm_ops;
+ chip->devname = xasprintf("pwm%d", i);
+ chip->id = i;
+ chip->dev = dev;
+
+ ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id imx_tpm_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm", },
+ { /* sentinel */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_tpm_pwm_dt_ids);
+
+static struct driver imx_tpm_pwm_driver = {
+ .name = "imx7ulp-tpm-pwm",
+ .probe = pwm_imx_tpm_probe,
+ .of_compatible = imx_tpm_pwm_dt_ids,
+};
+coredevice_platform_driver(imx_tpm_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("i.MX TPM PWM Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] PWM: imx: pwm-imx-tpm: Add driver support
2025-01-28 15:14 [PATCH v2] PWM: imx: pwm-imx-tpm: Add driver support Michael Grzeschik
@ 2025-01-28 15:27 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2025-01-28 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Grzeschik, barebox
Hello Michael,
On 28.01.25 16:14, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> + for (i = 0; i < npwm; i++) {
> + struct imx_tpm_pwm_chip *tpmc = &tpm->pwm[i];
> +
> + chip = &tpmc->chip;
> +
> + tpmc->tpm = tpm;
> + tpmc->tpm->base = base;
> + tpmc->tpm->clk = clk;
> +
> + chip->ops = &imx_tpm_pwm_ops;
> + chip->devname = xasprintf("pwm%d", i);
You're not registering different PWM controllers here, but channels
of the same PWM controller. If another PWM controller is enabled
and probed, it will try to claim pwm0 again for itself and the
later probe would fail.
Until we have PWM channel support in the core, you will need to
take care of this here yourself by using e.g. pwmXchY as name.
See drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c for an example. You'll likely want
to drop the + 1 there though, because TPM channels start counting
from zero (as seen in imx93-pinfunc.h)
Thanks,
Ahmad
> + chip->id = i;
> + chip->dev = dev;
> +
> + ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id imx_tpm_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm", },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_tpm_pwm_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct driver imx_tpm_pwm_driver = {
> + .name = "imx7ulp-tpm-pwm",
> + .probe = pwm_imx_tpm_probe,
> + .of_compatible = imx_tpm_pwm_dt_ids,
> +};
> +coredevice_platform_driver(imx_tpm_pwm_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("i.MX TPM PWM Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-28 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-28 15:14 [PATCH v2] PWM: imx: pwm-imx-tpm: Add driver support Michael Grzeschik
2025-01-28 15:27 ` Ahmad Fatoum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox