From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PHzvM-0005Q5-Vd for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:20:53 +0000 Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so560809qwg.36 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:20:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: From: Belisko Marek List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: sparse warnings To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, barebox compilation with C=1 produce a lot of sparse warnings. Mainly concerning __iomem problems with readb() and similar functions. Make it sense to take care or just could be omitted? thanks, marek -- as simple and primitive as possible ------------------------------------------------- Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA Freelance Developer Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic Tel: +421 915 052 184 skype: marekwhite icq: 290551086 web: http://open-nandra.com _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox