From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.213.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SF98w-0008It-0c for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:11:50 +0000 Received: by yhjj52 with SMTP id j52so31820yhj.36 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:11:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201204032045.37563.jbe@pengutronix.de> References: <4F7B1221.2050907@gmail.com> <201204032045.37563.jbe@pengutronix.de> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 01:11:48 +0600 Message-ID: From: Alexey Galakhov List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: S5PV210 CPU support To: Juergen Beisert Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Juergen Beisert wrote: > Alexey Galakhov wrote: > > Does somebody work on support of Samsung S5PC1xx and/or S5PV210 SoC? I'm > > just trying to port Barebox to Mini210/Tiny210 boards from FrinedlyArm. > > This would be really interesting. I'm working on S3C6410 support (for the > Mini6410), but progress is very slow due to lack of time. Can you please share any incomplete and/or non-working code you may have, just for reference? This would help a lot. It seems that the whole line of Samsung chips has many similar features, and I don't like to reinvent the wheel. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox