mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] reference errors in OMAP documetation
@ 2011-08-23 14:40 Antony Pavlov
  2011-08-24 16:32 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Antony Pavlov @ 2011-08-23 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox

Hi!

I posted this message some times ago, but nobody commented it.
So I reposting it.


I found some file reference errors in OMAP documentation.

I have made the patch, but I can't send it via git-send-email:
some lines in dox file are too long.

Here is the patch, please look at it:

http://prizma.bmstu.ru/~antony/barebox/0001-ARM-fix-formatting-and-file-references-in-documentat.patch

I think, it's better reformat OMAP documentation to avoid long lines
troubles problems in the future.

-- 
Best regards,
  Antony Pavlov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] reference errors in OMAP documetation
  2011-08-23 14:40 [RFC] reference errors in OMAP documetation Antony Pavlov
@ 2011-08-24 16:32 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2011-08-24 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Antony Pavlov; +Cc: barebox

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:40:24PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I posted this message some times ago, but nobody commented it.
> So I reposting it.
> 
> 
> I found some file reference errors in OMAP documentation.
> 
> I have made the patch, but I can't send it via git-send-email:
> some lines in dox file are too long.
> 
> Here is the patch, please look at it:
> 
> http://prizma.bmstu.ru/~antony/barebox/0001-ARM-fix-formatting-and-file-references-in-documentat.patch

I just added a wiki account for you, let me know if this works.

We could add a developer/arm/omap page in the wiki with the correct
version of the text. There are some parts in it I don't exactly agree
with, for example the policy to put all omap boards into
arch/arm/boards/omap. The panda board does not do so and really the
other boards shouldn't do it aswell.
Originally Nishanth said that all omap boards are so similar that
the code should be in a single directory. I did not realize it
at that time, having common code is a good thing, but it should go
to arch/arm/mach-omap and the board code still in arch/arm/boards/<name>

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-24 16:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-23 14:40 [RFC] reference errors in OMAP documetation Antony Pavlov
2011-08-24 16:32 ` Sascha Hauer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox