From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TU0Ik-0000Q6-7T for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:19:38 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e14so4032939iej.36 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:19:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1351791438-29967-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> References: <1351791438-29967-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 23:19:36 +0400 Message-ID: From: Antony Pavlov List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Y-Modem implementation change To: Robert Jarzmik Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 1 November 2012 21:37, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This patchset aims at changing the Y-Modem protocol implementation. > You have already seen the RFC version, this is the next version, which : > - provides a much more tested version > - is ready for review > > The following comments have been taken into account : > - Antony: testing on a serial line > - Sascha: split between protocol and commands > - Jean-Christophe: kermit protocol change > > So before doing the real review, could I ask of you : > - Antony: could you redo your test over a serial line by applying only > the first patch so that you can compare loady and loady2 ? > Don't use "loady2 -g", as Y-Modem/G protocol requires a > lossless line (USB), and a serial line cannot guarantee it. I have redone the test. Sorry, but the new 'loady2' does not work. I tested it over 9600 and over 115200 serial line. > - Sascha: does the split command/protocol suit you ? > - Jean-Christophe: I left the loadb implementation as it is. The goal > of the patch is to change X-Modem and Y-Modem(G) > implementation, not kermit. Could you test that I > have not created a regression of loadb ? > > Cheers. > > -- > Robert > > Robert Jarzmik (2): > commands: change Y-Modem implementation > commands: remove old Y-Modem implementation > > commands/Makefile | 4 +- > commands/loadb.c | 102 +------ > commands/loads.c | 1 - > commands/loadxy.c | 238 ++++++++++++++++ > commands/xymodem.c | 552 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > commands/xyzModem.c | 785 --------------------------------------------------- > include/xymodem.h | 25 ++ > include/xyzModem.h | 109 ------- > 8 files changed, 826 insertions(+), 990 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 commands/loadxy.c > create mode 100644 commands/xymodem.c > delete mode 100644 commands/xyzModem.c > create mode 100644 include/xymodem.h > delete mode 100644 include/xyzModem.h > > -- > 1.7.10 > -- Best regards, Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox