Re: Fwd: Micrel KSZ9031RN PHY problem

[Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia <guille.rodriguez@gmail.com>]

Hello,

2016-04-27 7:59 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2016-04-21 9:32 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:58:40PM +0200, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> 2016-04-19 9:11 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
>> >> > Hi Guillermo,
>> >> >
>> >> > +Cc Philipp Zabel who ported the patch to barebox
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:49:47PM +0200, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> >> >> Hello all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am playing with barebox on an Atmel SAMA5D3 Xplained board. It is
>> >> >> now working fine for the most part, however after updating to the
>> >> >> latest sources from git I found a problem that I had not seen before.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This board has two Ethernet interfaces; eth0 uses a Micrel KSZ9031RN
>> >> >> PHY, and eth1 uses a Micrel KSZ8081RNB PHY.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It seems that after release 2016.03.0, eth0 does not work anymore with
>> >> >> some routers. Specifically I found this problem with a Comtrend
>> >> >> VG-8050. I have tested other routers and the problem was not present
>> >> >> there.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> After some research it seems that the problem is caused by this
>> >> >> commit: http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=barebox.git;a=commit;h=da89ee8f2e04e116410632a185024f58b8262d87
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Before this commit eth0 was working fine. After this commit, the link
>> >> >> cannot established anymore:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [...]
>> >> >> barebox:/# ping 192.168.0.128
>> >> >> ping failed: Network is down
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Before diving further into this I thought it could be a good idea to
>> >> >> ask, in case someone can shed some light here.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have no idea what the issue is here. We might have to make this option
>> >> > configurable via devicetree to give boards different options. Since the
>> >> > patch comes from the Linux Kernel, do you have the same problems under
>> >> > Linux?
>> >>
>> >> I'm trying to get the latest kernel to boot. The latest version
>> >> supported by Atmel is 4.1, which doesn't have the patch yet. Will
>> >> report back asap.
>> >
>> > Thanks. We can revert this patch since Philipp only ported it to stay in
>> > sync with the kernel. Anyway, if it makes problems we'll probably need a
>> > solution for the kernel aswell.
>>
>> More info on this after researching the issue.
>>
>> Looks like problem is not directly caused by the modified FLP timings,
>> but is revealed by that change.
>>
>> Immediately after setting the FLP timings, the autonegotiation is
>> restarted by calling genphy_restart_aneg(phydev).
>> Within genphy_restart_aneg, the following line:
>>
>>     oldadv = adv = phy_read(phydev, MII_ADVERTISE);
>>
>> returns 0xffff, and negotiation fails.
>
> The code you are referring to seems to be the first phy access after the
> network device opens. Maybe the hardware is not yet ready for some
> reason. Could you add the same delay in macb_open() right before the
> call to phy_device_connect()?

Tried this, but doesn't help. Here's the call sequence, for example
when you run 'dhcp' from the command line prompt:

macb_open
phy_device_connect
phy_device_attach
phy_init_hw
ksz9031_config_init
ksz9031_center_flp_timing
genphy_restart_aneg
genphy_config_advert -> fails (adv = 0xffff)

I can verify that:
- Any delay happening before the call to genphy_restart_aneg (which
itself is called at the end of ksz9031_center_flp_timing) does not fix
the problem.
- Any delay happening after the phy_read(phydev, MII_ADVERTISE) insde
genphy_config_advert does not fix the problem.
- A delay of 1ms at any point after genphy_restart_aneg and before the
phy_read call in genphy_config_advert fixes the problem

Looks like the phy needs a bit of time after restarting autonegotiation..

Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
guille.rodriguez@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox