[PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Raphaël Poggi]

Change since v1:
        * Squash the commit [1] which adds the sam9x5 config.

This patcheset adds the device tree support for i2c Atmel driver and the corresping clocks
for the at91sam9g45 device.

Raphaël Poggi (2) :
        (1) i2c: at91: add support of device tree
        (2) at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks

arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 +++
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c    |   66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

[1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-August/020493.html


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

[PATCH V2 1/2] i2c: at91: add support of device tree

[Raphaël Poggi]

Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi <poggi.raph@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
index 399f6a9..944a8b3 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
@@ -346,6 +346,12 @@ static struct at91_twi_pdata at91sam9g10_config = {
 	.has_unre_flag = false,
 };
 
+static struct at91_twi_pdata at91sam9x5_config = {
+	.clk_max_div = 7,
+	.clk_offset = 4,
+	.has_unre_flag = false,
+};
+
 static struct platform_device_id at91_twi_devtypes[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "i2c-at91rm9200",
@@ -367,20 +373,63 @@ static struct platform_device_id at91_twi_devtypes[] = {
 	}
 };
 
+static struct of_device_id at91_twi_dt_ids[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-i2c",
+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91rm9200_config,
+	} , {
+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-i2c",
+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9260_config,
+	} , {
+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-i2c",
+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9261_config,
+	} , {
+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g20-i2c",
+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9g20_config,
+	} , {
+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g10-i2c",
+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9g10_config,
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-i2c",
+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9x5_config,
+	}, {
+		/* sentinel */
+	}
+};
+
+static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(struct device_d *dev)
+{
+    struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data = NULL;
+    int rc;
+
+    if (dev->device_node) {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
+	match = of_match_node(at91_twi_dt_ids, dev->device_node);
+	if (!match)
+	    i2c_data = NULL;
+	else
+	    i2c_data = (struct at91_twi_pdata *)match->data;
+    }
+    else {
+	rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
+	if (rc)
+	    i2c_data = NULL;
+    }
+
+    return i2c_data;
+}
+
 static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
 {
 	struct at91_twi_dev *i2c_at91;
-	struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data;
-	int rc;
+	int rc = 0;
 	u32 bus_clk_rate;
 
 	i2c_at91 = xzalloc(sizeof(struct at91_twi_dev));
 
-	rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
-	if (rc)
-		goto out_free;
-
-	i2c_at91->pdata = i2c_data;
+	i2c_at91->pdata = at91_twi_get_driver_data(dev);
+	if (!i2c_at91->pdata)
+	    goto out_free;
 
 	i2c_at91->base = dev_request_mem_region(dev, 0);
 	if (!i2c_at91->base) {
@@ -389,7 +438,7 @@ static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	i2c_at91->clk = clk_get(dev, "twi_clk");
+	i2c_at91->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(i2c_at91->clk)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "no clock defined\n");
 		rc = -ENODEV;
@@ -429,6 +478,7 @@ static struct driver_d at91_twi_driver = {
 	.name		= "at91-twi",
 	.probe		= at91_twi_probe,
 	.id_table	= at91_twi_devtypes,
+	.of_compatible	= DRV_OF_COMPAT(at91_twi_dt_ids),
 };
 device_platform_driver(at91_twi_driver);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] i2c: at91: add support of device tree

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi <poggi.raph@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> index 399f6a9..944a8b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,12 @@ static struct at91_twi_pdata at91sam9g10_config = {
>   	.has_unre_flag = false,
>   };
>
> +static struct at91_twi_pdata at91sam9x5_config = {
> +	.clk_max_div = 7,
> +	.clk_offset = 4,
> +	.has_unre_flag = false,
> +};
> +

Can you add this also for non device tree?

>   static struct platform_device_id at91_twi_devtypes[] = {
>   	{
>   		.name = "i2c-at91rm9200",
> @@ -367,20 +373,63 @@ static struct platform_device_id at91_twi_devtypes[] = {
>   	}
>   };
>
> +static struct of_device_id at91_twi_dt_ids[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-i2c",
> +		.data = (unsigned long) &at91rm9200_config,
> +	} , {
> +		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-i2c",
> +		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9260_config,
> +	} , {
> +		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-i2c",
> +		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9261_config,
> +	} , {
> +		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g20-i2c",
> +		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9g20_config,
> +	} , {
> +		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g10-i2c",
> +		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9g10_config,
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-i2c",
> +		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9x5_config,
> +	}, {
> +		/* sentinel */
> +	}
> +};
> +
> +static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(struct device_d *dev)
> +{
> +    struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data = NULL;
> +    int rc;
> +
> +    if (dev->device_node) {
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
> +	match = of_match_node(at91_twi_dt_ids, dev->device_node);
> +	if (!match)
> +	    i2c_data = NULL;
> +	else
> +	    i2c_data = (struct at91_twi_pdata *)match->data;
> +    }
> +    else {

Maybe better if: } else {

> +	rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
> +	if (rc)
> +	    i2c_data = NULL;
> +    }
> +
> +    return i2c_data;
> +}
> +
>   static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
>   {
>   	struct at91_twi_dev *i2c_at91;
> -	struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data;
> -	int rc;
> +	int rc = 0;
>   	u32 bus_clk_rate;
>
>   	i2c_at91 = xzalloc(sizeof(struct at91_twi_dev));
>
> -	rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
> -	if (rc)
> -		goto out_free;
> -
> -	i2c_at91->pdata = i2c_data;
> +	i2c_at91->pdata = at91_twi_get_driver_data(dev);
> +	if (!i2c_at91->pdata)
> +	    goto out_free;

Maybe add error information will be better.

Btw, do you use "tab" for alignment?

>   	i2c_at91->base = dev_request_mem_region(dev, 0);
>   	if (!i2c_at91->base) {
> @@ -389,7 +438,7 @@ static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
>   		goto out_free;
>   	}
>
> -	i2c_at91->clk = clk_get(dev, "twi_clk");
> +	i2c_at91->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
>   	if (IS_ERR(i2c_at91->clk)) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "no clock defined\n");
>   		rc = -ENODEV;
> @@ -429,6 +478,7 @@ static struct driver_d at91_twi_driver = {
>   	.name		= "at91-twi",
>   	.probe		= at91_twi_probe,
>   	.id_table	= at91_twi_devtypes,
> +	.of_compatible	= DRV_OF_COMPAT(at91_twi_dt_ids),
>   };
>   device_platform_driver(at91_twi_driver);
>
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] i2c: at91: add support of device tree

[Raphaël Poggi]

> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
> 
> On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> >Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi <poggi.raph@gmail.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> >index 399f6a9..944a8b3 100644
> >--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> >+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> >@@ -346,6 +346,12 @@ static struct at91_twi_pdata at91sam9g10_config = {
> >  	.has_unre_flag = false,
> >  };
> >
> >+static struct at91_twi_pdata at91sam9x5_config = {
> >+	.clk_max_div = 7,
> >+	.clk_offset = 4,
> >+	.has_unre_flag = false,
> >+};
> >+
> 
> Can you add this also for non device tree?
Ok no problem.

> 
> >  static struct platform_device_id at91_twi_devtypes[] = {
> >  	{
> >  		.name = "i2c-at91rm9200",
> >@@ -367,20 +373,63 @@ static struct platform_device_id at91_twi_devtypes[] = {
> >  	}
> >  };
> >
> >+static struct of_device_id at91_twi_dt_ids[] = {
> >+	{
> >+		.compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-i2c",
> >+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91rm9200_config,
> >+	} , {
> >+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-i2c",
> >+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9260_config,
> >+	} , {
> >+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-i2c",
> >+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9261_config,
> >+	} , {
> >+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g20-i2c",
> >+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9g20_config,
> >+	} , {
> >+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g10-i2c",
> >+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9g10_config,
> >+	}, {
> >+		.compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-i2c",
> >+		.data = (unsigned long) &at91sam9x5_config,
> >+	}, {
> >+		/* sentinel */
> >+	}
> >+};
> >+
> >+static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(struct device_d *dev)
> >+{
> >+    struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data = NULL;
> >+    int rc;
> >+
> >+    if (dev->device_node) {
> >+	const struct of_device_id *match;
> >+	match = of_match_node(at91_twi_dt_ids, dev->device_node);
> >+	if (!match)
> >+	    i2c_data = NULL;
> >+	else
> >+	    i2c_data = (struct at91_twi_pdata *)match->data;
> >+    }
> >+    else {
> 
> Maybe better if: } else {
Ok
> 
> >+	rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
> >+	if (rc)
> >+	    i2c_data = NULL;
> >+    }
> >+
> >+    return i2c_data;
> >+}
> >+
> >  static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct at91_twi_dev *i2c_at91;
> >-	struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data;
> >-	int rc;
> >+	int rc = 0;
> >  	u32 bus_clk_rate;
> >
> >  	i2c_at91 = xzalloc(sizeof(struct at91_twi_dev));
> >
> >-	rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
> >-	if (rc)
> >-		goto out_free;
> >-
> >-	i2c_at91->pdata = i2c_data;
> >+	i2c_at91->pdata = at91_twi_get_driver_data(dev);
> >+	if (!i2c_at91->pdata)
> >+	    goto out_free;
> 
> Maybe add error information will be better.

Yes, you're right.

> 
> Btw, do you use "tab" for alignment?
Yes, but maybe my vim config is wrong ? (set tabstop=4, set shiftwidth=4, set softtabstop=4)

> 
> >  	i2c_at91->base = dev_request_mem_region(dev, 0);
> >  	if (!i2c_at91->base) {
> >@@ -389,7 +438,7 @@ static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> >  		goto out_free;
> >  	}
> >
> >-	i2c_at91->clk = clk_get(dev, "twi_clk");
> >+	i2c_at91->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(i2c_at91->clk)) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "no clock defined\n");
> >  		rc = -ENODEV;
> >@@ -429,6 +478,7 @@ static struct driver_d at91_twi_driver = {
> >  	.name		= "at91-twi",
> >  	.probe		= at91_twi_probe,
> >  	.id_table	= at91_twi_devtypes,
> >+	.of_compatible	= DRV_OF_COMPAT(at91_twi_dt_ids),
> >  };
> >  device_platform_driver(at91_twi_driver);
> >
> >
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
> 

Thanks for you review,

Raphaël Poggi

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] i2c: at91: add support of device tree

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/04/2014 05:42 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>> >
>> >Btw, do you use "tab" for alignment?
> Yes, but maybe my vim config is wrong ? (set tabstop=4, set shiftwidth=4, set softtabstop=4)

In general, the tabstop = 8.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

[PATCH V2 2/2] at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks

[Raphaël Poggi]

Add the device tree and non device tree at91 i2c clocks.

Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi <poggi.raph@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
index f6031f0..d0f950c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
 	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("mci_clk", "atmel_mci1", &mmc1_clk),
 	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi0", &spi0_clk),
 	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi1", &spi1_clk),
+	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "at91-twi0", &twi0_clk),
+	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "at91-twi1", &twi1_clk),
+	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "fff84000.i2c", &twi0_clk),
+	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "fff88000.i2c", &twi1_clk),
 	CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio0", &pioA_clk),
 	CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio1", &pioB_clk),
 	CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio2", &pioC_clk),
-- 
1.7.9.5


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> Add the device tree and non device tree at91 i2c clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi <poggi.raph@gmail.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
> index f6031f0..d0f950c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
>   	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("mci_clk", "atmel_mci1", &mmc1_clk),
>   	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi0", &spi0_clk),
>   	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi1", &spi1_clk),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "at91-twi0", &twi0_clk),

s/CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID/CLKDEV_DEV_ID (also for the following).

the DEV_ID should be presented in the id_table in the driver.

> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "at91-twi1", &twi1_clk),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "fff84000.i2c", &twi0_clk),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "fff88000.i2c", &twi1_clk),
>   	CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio0", &pioA_clk),
>   	CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio1", &pioB_clk),
>   	CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio2", &pioC_clk),
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks

[Raphaël Poggi]

Hi,

I have used CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID because it is like that in Linux, but ok
I will replace it by CLKDEV_DEV_ID.

Btw, can you explain me why in Linux it's CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID ? (just by
curiosity)

Thanks,

Raphaël Poggi

2014-08-04 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>
>
> On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>
>> Add the device tree and non device tree at91 i2c clocks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi <poggi.raph@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> index f6031f0..d0f950c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
>> @@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
>>         CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("mci_clk", "atmel_mci1", &mmc1_clk),
>>         CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi0", &spi0_clk),
>>         CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi1", &spi1_clk),
>> +       CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "at91-twi0", &twi0_clk),
>
>
> s/CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID/CLKDEV_DEV_ID (also for the following).
>
> the DEV_ID should be presented in the id_table in the driver.
>
>
>> +       CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "at91-twi1", &twi1_clk),
>> +       CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "fff84000.i2c", &twi0_clk),
>> +       CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "fff88000.i2c", &twi1_clk),
>>         CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio0", &pioA_clk),
>>         CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio1", &pioB_clk),
>>         CLKDEV_DEV_ID("at91rm9200-gpio2", &pioC_clk),
>>
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,
   I try to manage to make the i2c driver work, however, failed for non 
device tree.
   I am still checking it. However, some comments for the patches.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> Change since v1:
>          * Squash the commit [1] which adds the sam9x5 config.
>
> This patcheset adds the device tree support for i2c Atmel driver and the corresping clocks
> for the at91sam9g45 device.
>
> Raphaël Poggi (2) :
>          (1) i2c: at91: add support of device tree
>          (2) at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 +++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c    |   66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-August/020493.html

Best Regards,
Bo Shen


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Raphaël Poggi]

Hi,

I have tested it on a custom board which use a sam9m10 and it
worked... Tell me more when we have found something suspicious.

Thanks for your test.

Raphaël Poggi

2014-08-04 11:11 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>   I try to manage to make the i2c driver work, however, failed for non
> device tree.
>   I am still checking it. However, some comments for the patches.
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
>
>
> On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>
>> Change since v1:
>>          * Squash the commit [1] which adds the sam9x5 config.
>>
>> This patcheset adds the device tree support for i2c Atmel driver and the
>> corresping clocks
>> for the at91sam9g45 device.
>>
>> Raphaël Poggi (2) :
>>          (1) i2c: at91: add support of device tree
>>          (2) at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 +++
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c    |   66
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-August/020493.html
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/04/2014 05:22 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tested it on a custom board which use a sam9m10 and it
> worked... Tell me more when we have found something suspicious.

I tested on sama5d3xek with qt1070 connect to i2c, and the i2c host 
register successfully, however can not access qt1070, if I use i2c-gpio 
driver, it works well.

I am still working on it, if any news, I will let you know.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

> Thanks for your test.
>
> Raphaël Poggi
>
> 2014-08-04 11:11 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
>> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>>    I try to manage to make the i2c driver work, however, failed for non
>> device tree.
>>    I am still checking it. However, some comments for the patches.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Bo Shen
>>
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 04:31 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>>
>>> Change since v1:
>>>           * Squash the commit [1] which adds the sam9x5 config.
>>>
>>> This patcheset adds the device tree support for i2c Atmel driver and the
>>> corresping clocks
>>> for the at91sam9g45 device.
>>>
>>> Raphaël Poggi (2) :
>>>           (1) i2c: at91: add support of device tree
>>>           (2) at91sam9g45: clock: add i2c clocks
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c |    4 +++
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c    |   66
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-August/020493.html
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Bo Shen
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> barebox mailing list
>> barebox@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Bo Shen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 765 bytes --]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/04/2014 05:29 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>
> On 08/04/2014 05:22 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have tested it on a custom board which use a sam9m10 and it
>> worked... Tell me more when we have found something suspicious.
>
> I tested on sama5d3xek with qt1070 connect to i2c, and the i2c host
> register successfully, however can not access qt1070, if I use i2c-gpio
> driver, it works well.
>
> I am still working on it, if any news, I will let you know.

I have re-write the interrupt function as the enclosed patch. Then, the 
i2c host driver works properly.

Can you help test it also on your board?

Thanks.

> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
>
>> Thanks for your test.
>>
>> Raphaël Poggi
>>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-I2C-at91-fix-the-method-for-interrupt.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2146 bytes --]

From 1dd3da701f15d360b5432c9d2eb6e5ca1e5368ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:41:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] I2C: at91: fix the method for interrupt

As the i2c-at91 driver won't work in the interrupt mode,
so need to poll the interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
index 944a8b3..8e3afe6 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
@@ -174,24 +174,32 @@ static void at91_twi_read_next_byte(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
 static int at91_twi_wait_completion(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
 {
 	uint64_t start = get_time_ns();
-	unsigned int status = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_SR);
-	unsigned int irqstatus = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_IMR);
+	unsigned int status;
+	unsigned int irqstatus;
+
+	do {
+		status = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_SR);
+		irqstatus = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_IMR);
+
+		if (!(status & irqstatus)) {
+			if(is_timeout(start, AT91_I2C_TIMEOUT)) {
+				dev_warn(&dev->adapter.dev, "timeout waiting for bus ready\n");
+				return -ETIMEDOUT;
+			} else {
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
 
-	if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_RXRDY)
-		at91_twi_read_next_byte(dev);
-	else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_TXRDY)
-		at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev);
-	else
-		dev_warn(&dev->adapter.dev, "neither rx and tx are ready\n");
+		if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_RXRDY)
+			at91_twi_read_next_byte(dev);
+		else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_TXRDY)
+			at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev);
+		else
+			dev_warn(&dev->adapter.dev, "neither rx and tx are ready\n");
 
-	dev->transfer_status |= status;
+		dev->transfer_status |= status;
 
-	while(!(at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_SR) & AT91_TWI_TXCOMP)) {
-		if(is_timeout(start, AT91_I2C_TIMEOUT)) {
-			dev_warn(&dev->adapter.dev, "timeout waiting for bus ready\n");
-			return -ETIMEDOUT;
-		}
-	}
+	} while (!(at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_SR) & AT91_TWI_TXCOMP));
 
 	at91_disable_twi_interrupts(dev);
 
-- 
1.8.5.2


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Raphaël Poggi]

Hello,

The patch works fine for me. Thanks for your review/help.

Best Regards,
Raphaël Poggi

2014-08-05 8:55 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>
>
> On 08/04/2014 05:29 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 05:22 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have tested it on a custom board which use a sam9m10 and it
>>> worked... Tell me more when we have found something suspicious.
>>
>>
>> I tested on sama5d3xek with qt1070 connect to i2c, and the i2c host
>> register successfully, however can not access qt1070, if I use i2c-gpio
>> driver, it works well.
>>
>> I am still working on it, if any news, I will let you know.
>
>
> I have re-write the interrupt function as the enclosed patch. Then, the i2c
> host driver works properly.
>
> Can you help test it also on your board?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> Best Regards,
>> Bo Shen
>>
>>> Thanks for your test.
>>>
>>> Raphaël Poggi
>>>
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Raphaël Poggi]

I am ready to send a v3. Are you going to send your fix or you want me
to squash it in v3 ?

Best Regards,
Raphaël Poggi

2014-08-05 10:32 GMT+02:00 Raphaël Poggi <raphio98@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> The patch works fine for me. Thanks for your review/help.
>
> Best Regards,
> Raphaël Poggi
>
> 2014-08-05 8:55 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
>> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>>
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 05:29 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2014 05:22 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have tested it on a custom board which use a sam9m10 and it
>>>> worked... Tell me more when we have found something suspicious.
>>>
>>>
>>> I tested on sama5d3xek with qt1070 connect to i2c, and the i2c host
>>> register successfully, however can not access qt1070, if I use i2c-gpio
>>> driver, it works well.
>>>
>>> I am still working on it, if any news, I will let you know.
>>
>>
>> I have re-write the interrupt function as the enclosed patch. Then, the i2c
>> host driver works properly.
>>
>> Can you help test it also on your board?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Bo Shen
>>>
>>>> Thanks for your test.
>>>>
>>>> Raphaël Poggi
>>>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Bo Shen

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/06/2014 04:05 AM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> I am ready to send a v3. Are you going to send your fix or you want me
> to squash it in v3 ?

Please send it together with your patch.
Thanks.

> Best Regards,
> Raphaël Poggi

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Raphaël Poggi]

Ok, about the "signed-off", do I have to let your name ? or my name +
your name ? Sorry if my question seems stupid, but i'm new to open
source development.

2014-08-06 3:06 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>
>
> On 08/06/2014 04:05 AM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>
>> I am ready to send a v3. Are you going to send your fix or you want me
>> to squash it in v3 ?
>
>
> Please send it together with your patch.
> Thanks.
>
>> Best Regards,
>> Raphaël Poggi
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Bo Shen]

Hi Raphaël Poggi,

On 08/06/2014 03:16 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> Ok, about the "signed-off", do I have to let your name ? or my name +
> your name ? Sorry if my question seems stupid, but i'm new to open
> source development.

I think, you can first "git am" my patch, and then apply your patch and 
generate the series and send it, then there won't have "signed-off" 
issue. (In general, keep my "signed-off" and add your "signed-off" if 
you prefer).

Best Regards,
Bo Shen



_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add device tree support of i2c Atmel driver

[Raphaël Poggi]

All right, thanks.

Raphaël Poggi

2014-08-06 9:33 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>:
> Hi Raphaël Poggi,
>
>
> On 08/06/2014 03:16 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
>>
>> Ok, about the "signed-off", do I have to let your name ? or my name +
>> your name ? Sorry if my question seems stupid, but i'm new to open
>> source development.
>
>
> I think, you can first "git am" my patch, and then apply your patch and
> generate the series and send it, then there won't have "signed-off" issue.
> (In general, keep my "signed-off" and add your "signed-off" if you prefer).
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox