From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1guQWt-00068G-KI for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:34:56 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id a62so8158401wmh.4 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:34:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190214132429.7463-1-tomaz.solc@tablix.org> <20190214132429.7463-6-tomaz.solc@tablix.org> In-Reply-To: <20190214132429.7463-6-tomaz.solc@tablix.org> From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:34:42 -0800 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mci: move after pinctrl in link order. To: Tomaz Solc Cc: Barebox List On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:26 AM Tomaz Solc wrote: > > pinctrl driver needs to be initialized before mci driver or the pinctrl > device tree properties in the mci node are ignored. Since mci is already > initialized by the coredevice_initcall(), changing the link order is currently > the only way to ensure that. What about changing pinctrl_config_one() and device_probe() to do probe deferral if corresponding pinctl is missing? Would this work? Thanks, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox