From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ARM: pbl: Add an option to validate DRAM
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:09:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqErPeoeL5Teq6UN4tAGs97EoGdNri7huM+d_HFqVis07g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150526065756.GZ6325@pengutronix.de>
> How about testing only a small fragment of DRAM, say 8MB, in your
> lowlevel board code and calling barebox_arm_entry() with the
> membase/memsize you previously tested? This way you can make sure that
> barebox only uses tested memory without having to test all memory before
> calling barebox_arm_entry() and without having to call back into some
> testing function.
I like that solution and it does allow to get rid of all of that nasty
linking address agnostic code. The only problem that I see with it is
that if I start Barebox with 8MB of memory and then try to boot Linux
of_memory_fixup() will modify the devicetree file and cause Linux to
think the machine only has 8MB of RAM as well. Any ideas on how to
deal with that?
Thank you,
Andrey
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 2:54 [PATCH 01/10] common/memtest.c: Fix incorrect array boundary check Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] common/memtest.c: Do not omit offset of 0 from tests Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] common/memtest.c: Refactor mem_test() into three surbroutines Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] common/memtest.c: Distil common error reporting code Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] serial: i.MX: Write settings to a correct register Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] common: pbl: Allow boards to override hang() Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-15 5:25 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-23 18:13 ` Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] debug_ll: i.MX: Add support for input to DEBUG_LL Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] i.MX51: babbage: Add UART RXD pin configuration Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] pbl: Implement ctrlc() using getc_ll() Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-14 2:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: pbl: Add an option to validate DRAM Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-19 7:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-23 18:48 ` Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-23 20:44 ` Alexander Aring
2015-05-24 18:39 ` Andrey Smirnov
2015-05-26 6:57 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-06-01 13:09 ` Andrey Smirnov [this message]
2015-06-03 8:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-15 5:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] common/memtest.c: Fix incorrect array boundary check Sascha Hauer
2015-05-23 18:20 ` Andrey Smirnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHQ1cqErPeoeL5Teq6UN4tAGs97EoGdNri7huM+d_HFqVis07g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox