From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from conssluserg-02.nifty.com ([210.131.2.81]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k2p6j-0001qt-OE for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:03:27 +0000 Received: from mail-vk1-f176.google.com (mail-vk1-f176.google.com [209.85.221.176]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-02.nifty.com with ESMTP id 07452rQo016485 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:02:53 +0900 Received: by mail-vk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id o2so1011645vkn.9 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 22:02:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200721061523.27105-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> <20200803212133.GM31536@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20200803212133.GM31536@pengutronix.de> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:02:16 +0900 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: remove stale instances of struct device To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Barebox List , Ahmad Fatoum On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:22 AM Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 08:15:23AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > We call it struct device_d, any instances of struct device are likely > > left-over code after porting from Linux. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum > > --- > > drivers/crypto/caam/intern.h | 5 ----- > > drivers/crypto/caam/jr.h | 2 -- > > drivers/gpio/gpio-sx150x.c | 1 - > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c | 9 --------- > > 4 files changed, 17 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks > > Sascha Why doesn't barebox use (struct device)? (Of course its implementation is much simpler than that of Linux). -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox