From: Roberto Nibali <rnibali@gmail.com>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add two architectures which can detect the reset source
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:50:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAONxwYPA1xhS8X0VrzJzSrYratGKdsnV3F=Ks8kB56L+vfvk=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206212101.42996.jbe@pengutronix.de>
Hi
> Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:16:18AM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > > These are examples how to provide the reset source. Not really tested on
> > > the corresponding hardware yet.
> >
> > I did. On i.MX1 it does not work. The reset source register is not
> > inside the watchdog module, but at 0x0021b800 (Reset source register,
> > RSR)
>
> Hmm, in my old MC9328MX1 manual the watchdog register at 0x201008 (=Watchdog
> Status Register) reports in bit 0 (=TOUT) if the watchdog timed out.
>
> But the RSR seems a more reliable source to read the status.
>
> > On i.MX27 it correctly detects a watchdog reset but not a power on
> > reset. On i.MX27 it must be:
> >
> > # define WDOG_WRSR_EXT (1 << 3)
> > # define WDOG_WRSR_PWR (1 << 4)
>
> Ups, sure. "not really tested"...I told you so ;)
> Time for a #ifdef hell?
On i.MX258 it's 0x53FDC000 + 0x0004 (WRSR) and bits 0 and 1, as follows:
Bit: 1 (TOUT)
Time-out. Indicates whether the reset is the result of a WDOG time-out.
0 Reset is not the result of a WDOG time-out.
1 Reset is the result of a WDOG time-out.
Bit: 0 (SFTW)
Software Reset. Indicates whether the reset is the result of a WDOG
software reset by asserting SRS bit
0 Reset is not the result of a software reset.
1 Reset is the result of a software reset.
Cheers
Roberto
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-21 9:16 [PATCHv2] Enable a way to provide the reason for "being here" Juergen Beisert
2012-06-21 9:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Juergen Beisert
2012-06-21 9:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add two architectures which can detect the reset source Juergen Beisert
2012-06-21 18:27 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-21 19:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-06-21 19:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-06-21 21:50 ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-20 14:32 [PATCH] Enable a way to provide the reason for "being here" Juergen Beisert
2012-06-20 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add two architectures which can detect the reset source Juergen Beisert
2012-06-20 14:59 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-20 15:05 ` Juergen Beisert
2012-06-20 15:09 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAONxwYPA1xhS8X0VrzJzSrYratGKdsnV3F=Ks8kB56L+vfvk=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rnibali@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox