* Re: Verified boot support with FIT
[not found] <CAPnjgZ187+14Fn-aeBkzV9Yv7MXOYPbTJjzCrHByuO04=OoAww@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2016-01-14 20:03 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2016-01-15 8:36 ` Jan Lübbe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2016-01-14 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Glass, barebox
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 876 bytes --]
On 01/14/2016 08:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Someone pointed me to this support that is being added in Barebox. I see
> that it still has the copyright but does not attribute U-Boot. I'm just
> checking if that is that an oversight?
I've Cc'ed Jan, who has written the code. Quoting from his first patch
to the barebox mailinglist:
> this is the current work-in-progress state of my FIT support patches.
> The FIT loading code has basically been rewritten from scratch, as the
> original U-Boot code uses libfdt and barebox's DT support works on an
> in-memory tree.
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Verified boot support with FIT
2016-01-14 20:03 ` Verified boot support with FIT Marc Kleine-Budde
@ 2016-01-15 8:36 ` Jan Lübbe
2016-01-16 1:18 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Lübbe @ 2016-01-15 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Simon Glass; +Cc: barebox
On Do, 2016-01-14 at 21:03 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 08:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Someone pointed me to this support that is being added in Barebox. I see
> > that it still has the copyright but does not attribute U-Boot. I'm just
> > checking if that is that an oversight?
>
> I've Cc'ed Jan, who has written the code. Quoting from his first patch
> to the barebox mailinglist:
>
> > this is the current work-in-progress state of my FIT support patches.
> > The FIT loading code has basically been rewritten from scratch, as the
> > original U-Boot code uses libfdt and barebox's DT support works on an
> > in-memory tree.
Yes, this is still correct for the recent submissions.
The barebox code only supports the signed configurations with hashed
images, as the goal was to use this for verified boot. Supporting only
this mode keeps the complexity down.
Simon, do you think it is a derived work of the U-Boot FIT code?
Regards,
Jan Lübbe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Verified boot support with FIT
2016-01-15 8:36 ` Jan Lübbe
@ 2016-01-16 1:18 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2016-01-16 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Lübbe; +Cc: barebox
Hi Jan,
On 15 January 2016 at 01:36, Jan Lübbe <jlu@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Do, 2016-01-14 at 21:03 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 01/14/2016 08:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Someone pointed me to this support that is being added in Barebox. I see
>> > that it still has the copyright but does not attribute U-Boot. I'm just
>> > checking if that is that an oversight?
>>
>> I've Cc'ed Jan, who has written the code. Quoting from his first patch
>> to the barebox mailinglist:
>>
>> > this is the current work-in-progress state of my FIT support patches.
>> > The FIT loading code has basically been rewritten from scratch, as the
>> > original U-Boot code uses libfdt and barebox's DT support works on an
>> > in-memory tree.
>
> Yes, this is still correct for the recent submissions.
>
> The barebox code only supports the signed configurations with hashed
> images, as the goal was to use this for verified boot. Supporting only
> this mode keeps the complexity down.
>
> Simon, do you think it is a derived work of the U-Boot FIT code?
The verified boot implementation looks like it came from U-Boot.
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Verified boot support with FIT
@ 2016-01-14 20:05 Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2016-01-14 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Hi,
Someone pointed me to this support that is being added in Barebox. I
see that it still has the copyright but does not attribute U-Boot. I'm
just checking if that is that an oversight?
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-16 1:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAPnjgZ187+14Fn-aeBkzV9Yv7MXOYPbTJjzCrHByuO04=OoAww@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-14 20:03 ` Verified boot support with FIT Marc Kleine-Budde
2016-01-15 8:36 ` Jan Lübbe
2016-01-16 1:18 ` Simon Glass
2016-01-14 20:05 Simon Glass
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox