From: Renaud Barbier <Renaud.Barbier@ametek.com>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <lst@pengutronix.de>
Subject: RE: PCIE on LS1021A
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:39:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR07MB97664BF8CA2EBFAEC8C81C63EC91A@SJ0PR07MB9766.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4339f2e-e306-4f84-a43b-751ef7b4ed55@pengutronix.de>
Just to let you know I was developing from barebox 2024.09 as this was a requirement for our product.
I started to move the LPAE support and follow the next branch.
Barebox is booting but currently failing to probe the PCIe NVME device.
A bit more debugging and hopefully, I can get something soon.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 20 January 2026 13:41
> To: Renaud Barbier <Renaud.Barbier@ametek.com>; Barebox List
> <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <lst@pengutronix.de>
> Subject: Re: PCIE on LS1021A
>
> ***NOTICE*** This came from an external source. Use caution when
> replying, clicking links, or opening attachments.
>
> Hello Renaud,
>
> On 1/13/26 7:26 PM, Renaud Barbier wrote:
> > Changing the NVME to the PCIe2 bus and fixing a few things in the MMU
> support, I am now able to detect the NVME:
> >
> > nvme pci-126f:2263.0: serial: A012410180629000000 nvme
> > pci-126f:2263.0: model: SM681GEF AGS nvme pci-126f:2263.0: firmware:
> > TFX7GB
> >
> > barebox:/ ls /dev/nvme0n1
> > barebox:/ ls /dev/nvme0n1*
> > /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme0n1.0
> > /dev/nvme0n1.1 /dev/nvme0n1.2
> > /dev/nvme0n1.3 /dev/nvme0n1.4
> > ...
> >
> > Thanks to the following remapping:
> > /* PCIe1 Config and memory area remapping */
> > map_io_sections(0x4000000000ULL, IOMEM(0x24000000), 192 << 20); /*
> > PCIE1 conf space */ //map_io_sections(0x4040000000ULL,
> > IOMEM(0x40000000), 128 << 20); /* PCIE1 mem space */
> >
> > /* PCIe2 Config and memory area remapping */
> > map_io_sections(0x4800000000ULL, IOMEM(0x34000000), 192 << 20); /*
> > PCIe2 config space */ map_io_sections(0x4840000000ULL,
> > IOMEM(0x50000000), 128 << 20); /* PCIE2 mem space */
> >
> > For some reason, I had to comment out the remapping of the PCIe1 MEM
> space as the system hangs just after detecting the NVME device.
> > The PCIe1 device node is not even enabled.
> > If you have a clue, let me know.
>
> I don't have an idea off the top of my head sorry.
> If you have something roughly working, it would be good if you could check it
> works with qemu-system-arm -M virt,highmem=on and send an initial patch
> series?
>
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Renaud
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: barebox <barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On Behalf Of
> >> Renaud Barbier
> >> Sent: 07 January 2026 09:44
> >> To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>; Barebox List
> >> <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
> >> Cc: Lucas Stach <lst@pengutronix.de>
> >> Subject: RE: PCIE on LS1021A
> >>
> >> ***NOTICE*** This came from an external source. Use caution when
> >> replying, clicking links, or opening attachments.
> >>
> >> Based on your information and U-boot and I have started to work on
> >> the LPAE support. So far full of debugging and hacks.
> >>
> >> It is based on the mmu_32.c file. As I have failed to use the 3 MMU
> >> tables, at present I am using only 2 as in u-boot.
> >> The 64-bit PCI space is remapped with:
> >> map_io_sections(0x4000000000ULL ,IOMEM(0x24000000UL), 192 << 20);
> >>
> >> To detect the NVME device, the virtulal address 0x24000000 is
> >> hard-coded into the functions dw_pcie_[wr|rd]_other_conf of
> >> drivers/pci/pcie- designware-host.c as follows:
> >> if (bus->primary == pp->root_bus_nr) {
> >> type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0;
> >> cpu_addr = pp->cfg0_base;
> >> cfg_size = pp->cfg0_size;
> >> pp->va_cfg0_base = IOMEM(0x24000000); /* XXX */
> >> va_cfg_base = pp->va_cfg0_base;
> >>
> >> What is the method to pass the address to the driver?
> >>
> >> And I get the following:
> >> layerscape-pcie 3400000.pcie@3400000.of: host bridge
> >> /soc/pcie@3400000
> >> ranges:
> >> layerscape-pcie 3400000.pcie@3400000.of: Parsing ranges property...
> >> layerscape-pcie 3400000.pcie@3400000.of: IO
> >> 0x4000010000..0x400001ffff -> 0x0000000000
> >> layerscape-pcie 3400000.pcie@3400000.of: MEM
> >> 0x4040000000..0x407fffffff -> 0x0040000000
> >>
> >> ERROR: io_bus_addr = 0x0, io_base = 0x4000010000
> >> ERROR: mem_bus_addr = 0x4040000000 -> Based on Linux output, the
> >> mem_bus_addr should be as above 0x4000.0000 to be programmed in
> the
> >> ATU target register.
> >> ERROR: mem_base = 0x4040000000, offset = 0x0
> >>
> >> ERROR: layerscape-pcie 3400000.pcie@3400000.of: iATU unroll: disabled
> >>
> >> pci: pci_scan_bus for bus 0
> >> pci: last_io = 0x00010000, last_mem = 0x40000000, last_mem_pref =
> >> 0x00000000
> >> pci: class = 00000604, hdr_type = 00000001
> >> pci: 00:00 [1957:0e0a]
> >> pci: pci_scan_bus for bus 1
> >> pci: last_io = 0x00010000, last_mem = 0x40000000, last_mem_pref =
> >> 0x00000000
> >>
> >> pci: class = 00000108, hdr_type = 00000000
> >> pci: 01:00 [126f:2263] -> NVME device found
> >> pci: pbar0: mask=ffffc004 NP-MEM 16384 bytes
> >> ERROR: pci: &&& sub = 0x2263, 0x126f kind = NP-MEM&&&
> >> ERROR: pci: &&& write BAR 0x10 = 0x40000000 &&& ...
> >> pci: pci_scan_bus returning with max=02
> >> pci: bridge NP limit at 0x40100000
> >> pci: bridge IO limit at 0x00010000
> >> pci: pbar0: mask=ff000000 NP-MEM 16777216 bytes
> >> pci: pbar1: mask=fc000000 NP-MEM 67108864 bytes
> >> pci: pci_scan_bus returning with max=02
> >> ERROR: nvme pci-126f:2263.0: enabling bus mastering
> >>
> >> Then, the system hangs on the instruction 3 lines below:
> >> ERROR: nvme_pci_enable : 0x4000001c -> Fails to access the NVME CSTS
> >> register. It does not matter if mem_bus_addr is set to 0x4000.0000 to
> >> program the ATU to translate the address 0x40.4000.0000 to
> 0x4000.0000.
> >> if (readl(dev->bar + NVME_REG_CSTS) == -1)
> >>
> >> 0x4000.0000 is also the quadSPI memory area. So I guess I should
> >> remap the access too.
> >>
> >> Unhappily, my work is now at a stop as there is a hardware failure on
> >> my system.
> >>
> >> Note: the MMU may not be set properly as the out of-band fails to on
> >> TX timeout. I can reach the prompt after the NVME probing failed.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 |
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.pengutronix.de/__;!!HKOSU0g!DlZ
> b2oy6FdvgOu3JutuBMr0zf4ib6x_vlFyfBU3Fgcpgud4iuzA7FLewuR6dBQULYVe
> xgDvoQqAlgtgyY1fAds9Tovg$ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-09 17:31 Renaud Barbier
2022-12-09 18:01 ` Renaud Barbier
2022-12-09 18:37 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-09 18:58 ` Renaud Barbier
2022-12-09 19:01 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-12-13 9:40 ` Renaud Barbier
2022-12-09 19:18 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2025-11-18 17:42 ` Renaud Barbier
2025-11-28 10:14 ` Ahmad Fatoum
[not found] ` <BN8PR07MB6993379BECE786EB6B07106FECA7A@BN8PR07MB6993.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
2025-12-11 10:46 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2026-01-07 9:43 ` Renaud Barbier
2026-01-13 18:26 ` Renaud Barbier
2026-01-20 13:41 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2026-01-28 16:39 ` Renaud Barbier [this message]
2026-02-02 9:57 ` Renaud Barbier
2026-02-02 10:13 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ0PR07MB97664BF8CA2EBFAEC8C81C63EC91A@SJ0PR07MB9766.namprd07.prod.outlook.com \
--to=renaud.barbier@ametek.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lst@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox