From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from blaine.gmane.org ([195.159.176.226]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iolHx-00051Y-VR for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 09:36:42 +0000 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iolHv-00085D-JL for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 10:36:35 +0100 From: Frederick Gotham Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:36:29 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Why the internal kernel header? To: barebox@lists.infradead.org I'm using Barebox with Buildroot. Previously I was using Barebox version 2018.12.0, and now I have upgraded to version 2019.12.0. Barebox version 2019.12.0 won't compile for me with Buildroot, because the header "" is missing. The reason why this header file is missing is that "list.h" is an internal kernel header file, rather than a userspace kernel header file. I could try simply copying "list.h" into the appropriate directory in order to get Barebox to compile, but I'm not keen on doing that. Does Barebox really need that header file, and if so, why? Frederick _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox