From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:14:40 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n7PPc-00HHh7-Ti for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:14:40 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n7PPa-0000XW-UZ for lore@pengutronix.de; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:14:39 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=GxvgzBRJ6/JGTh5aTJar+ajPFEWQuxfqu1mt4TcBmIo=; b=1SYasEUUtcLLYy TqF5JRUc6WRknXzmlt3ZcKaXRilWAejt6ZFcAYz4uvW41qlGn2KPHY6oBLnE6rXj91qjiJsYYXYEP qtCj3njx2VU63xeX6fz570pMCBGPW7Z8aMhioeD79HM3QpE3XKBkBp48Sqn/eNK/BsQVVX+ahdYHV VuGImnBU9UYqEpr8a22tS66+9fGZ52I21XFSY8PfdA7KNbga0g2KL3IMcZ5rt7PfWIs/m6HfGLKib r9x7DLHMlCG58FooJ6kF7AmH+TXwum9cHatU5ye96Bmqv691zvdAO4nk4RHMnKTPm6sckLKlJJDPg QU02Sx9aLJ4tP8llyPNA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n7PNx-000KSJ-Tn; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:12:57 +0000 Received: from mx1.smtp.larsendata.com ([91.221.196.215]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n7PNs-000KR8-JU for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:12:54 +0000 Received: from mail01.mxhotel.dk (mail01.mxhotel.dk [91.221.196.236]) by mx1.smtp.larsendata.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id b3b97a0c-732b-11ec-b20b-0050568c148b; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ravnborg.org (80-162-45-141-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [80.162.45.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sam@ravnborg.org) by mail01.mxhotel.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BC60194B10; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:12:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:12:39 +0100 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@mxhotel.dk From: Sam Ravnborg To: Ahmad Fatoum Cc: Barebox List Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220111_141252_834996_E00F063A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.96 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:e::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: Q about bootstrap support for at91sam92* boards and proposal for retirement X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de) Hi Ahmad, > > I have the code locally - but this time I will not have it posted before > > it is tested. > > > > Then I cloned the latest at91bootstrap - but they no longer support old > > at91sam92xx CPUs. > > So it was time to enable bootstrap support for at91sam9263. > > > > In the past I had something working, but alas no luck this time. > > > > Can anyone (Ahmad?) help me a little how to get the bootstrap > > functionality working on the at91sam9263? > > > > I do not expect patches, but I hope for something that can point me in > > the right way to do it. > > > > I have skov-arm9cpu boards (plenty - as they are mostly retired by SKOV) > > and one at91sam9263ek where I can test. > > The skov-arm9cpu looks like it already runs first stage without at91bootstrap? > So the issue is only with at91sam9263ek? For the moment my focus is on the skov-arm9cpu - and here bootstrap is not (yet) functional. But I think with all the good feedback from you and Oleksij I should manage. Thanks for the replies! > > We see very little interest in at91sam92* boards and we could decide > > to retire all the boards that are not updated to multi-image. > > As long as it works, I guess most people don't see a reason make interest > publicly known. > > > This could simplify things - and if there is interest the missing boards > > can be brought back to life provided they are updated to multi image. > > Any comments on this? > > I have only worked on SAMA5D3 and SAMA5D2. Of course, I'd like to see > board code in AT91 replaced with DT-enabled/multi-image-compatible code, > but I don't think it will happen. I don't think the maintenance burden > is high, so I'd just leave it as is. If it bitrots and people complain, > we can nudge them into the right direction. OK, you are right that if it just works no reason to touch it. I will do the patches alongside the current codebase then. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox