From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 19:40:41 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6d7R-00FR4Z-6P for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 19:40:41 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n6d7P-0005OF-Uj for lore@pengutronix.de; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 19:40:40 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From :Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=a+ombl8g/iI8FlG3z9ynY/NGvbEoe+h8kBQ9/ba8irk=; b=u8IDDhEklNFpJo CJ+hD9yntydzQbJjb9BR0r0F2ZKNC3Idr2GqGQrG66tvR9Uug+Xcr4kQFnrMrK9R8LyV4Q5bJBI7C mSv7VfIXyI/cXNzJsD7Qu+LjBrB2zLqvRc3g8bHF0lvScpKIE0WVuDl87rkwEtvbDQ26g+S70bmCS FGQR8JuRcoM/MRPPfwOYwpcnCbNK3AgCJfeIjV3ahxaATuCN1pGDoYM5JILE5QiZQv4CRxaK5rOI0 vxKm4AJoyihUKwNc3FnEx/1NePc6TGpvjNb2qXtdxG03yhDSemT5kI44NwLmJOqQsM2yiMyFt60kE JUwPQF5atE7XajkY4X3w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n6d5k-008FGu-Q6; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 18:38:56 +0000 Received: from mx1.smtp.larsendata.com ([91.221.196.215]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n6d5g-008FG2-11 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 18:38:53 +0000 Received: from mail01.mxhotel.dk (mail01.mxhotel.dk [91.221.196.236]) by mx1.smtp.larsendata.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 77aad817-717b-11ec-b20b-0050568c148b; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ravnborg.org (80-162-45-141-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [80.162.45.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sam@ravnborg.org) by mail01.mxhotel.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B12B194B00; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 19:38:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 19:38:38 +0100 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@mxhotel.dk From: Sam Ravnborg To: Barebox List , Ahmad Fatoum Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220109_103852_261443_526D4178 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.60 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:e::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Q about bootstrap support for at91sam92* boards and proposal for retirement X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de) Hi all. This little detour started because Ahmad pointed out I had made a stupid mistake in pwm-atmel. So I decided I wanted to give it a spin to verify if it actually works now. The first challenge I encountered was that said driver had bit-rotted as it used the old pwm framework - so I updated it from the Linux kernel. I have the code locally - but this time I will not have it posted before it is tested. Then I cloned the latest at91bootstrap - but they no longer support old at91sam92xx CPUs. So it was time to enable bootstrap support for at91sam9263. In the past I had something working, but alas no luck this time. Can anyone (Ahmad?) help me a little how to get the bootstrap functionality working on the at91sam9263? I do not expect patches, but I hope for something that can point me in the right way to do it. I have skov-arm9cpu boards (plenty - as they are mostly retired by SKOV) and one at91sam9263ek where I can test. We see very little interest in at91sam92* boards and we could decide to retire all the boards that are not updated to multi-image. This could simplify things - and if there is interest the missing boards can be brought back to life provided they are updated to multi image. Any comments on this? I am happy to type the patches - and verify that the boards I have works. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox