mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "open list:BAREBOX" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>,
	Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] mci: add RPMB support
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:28:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-EXr6JXt0Q_MqqQ@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63082337-c9aa-467b-9a6b-5c98e5614c88@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 04:53:02PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/19/25 16:30, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > This implements the MMC specific part to access RPMB partitions:
> > 
> > - Provide a function to find a RPMB capable eMMC
> > - partition switching to the RPMB partition
> > - Dissecting the OP-TEE requests into the correspnding MMC read/write
> >   multiblock commands
> > 
> > For now we only support a single eMMC RPMB partition per board. This is
> > the 99% case, but there might be systems with multiple eMMCs. The OP-TEE
> > protocol has a dev_id field to support multiple eMMCs, but OP-TEE itself
> > currently only supports a single RPMB. This means we really only need to
> > support one eMMC, but should there be multiple eMMCs on a system we will
> > need a way for the user to specify which one shall be used. As of now
> > the first one found will be used.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mci/Kconfig    |   3 +
> >  drivers/mci/Makefile   |   1 +
> >  drivers/mci/mci-core.c |  37 +++++++--
> >  drivers/mci/rpmb.c     | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/mci.h          |   5 ++
> >  5 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mci/Kconfig b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> > index 4641e9cdcd..09648aa771 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mci/Kconfig
> > @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ config MCI_MMC_GPP_PARTITIONS
> >  	  Note: by default, 'MMC' devices have no 'general purpose partitions',
> >  	  it requires a special one-time configuration step to enable them.
> >  
> > +config MCI_MMC_RPMB
> > +	bool "Support eMMC replay protected memory block (RPMB)"
> > +
> >  comment "--- MCI host drivers ---"
> >  
> >  config MCI_DWC_MSHC
> > diff --git a/drivers/mci/Makefile b/drivers/mci/Makefile
> > index 5e951d695f..d3df4c1bb6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mci/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mci/Makefile
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MCI)		+= mci-core.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_RPMB)	+= rpmb.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_AM654)		+= am654-sdhci.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_ARASAN)	+= arasan-sdhci.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MCI_ATMEL)		+= atmel_mci.o atmel_mci_common.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> > index 3bf0f15def..48bdd1a0c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> > @@ -2052,7 +2052,9 @@ int mci_blk_part_switch(struct mci_part *part)
> >  	struct mci *mci = part->mci;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_BOOT_PARTITIONS) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_GPP_PARTITIONS))
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_BOOT_PARTITIONS) &&
> > +	    !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_GPP_PARTITIONS) &&
> > +	    !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCI_MMC_RPMB))
> >  		return 0; /* no need */
> >  
> >  	if (mci->part_curr == part)
> > @@ -2953,7 +2955,6 @@ void mci_of_parse_node(struct mci_host *host,
> >  {
> >  	u32 bus_width;
> >  	u32 dsr_val;
> > -	const char *alias;
> >  
> >  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFDEVICE))
> >  		return;
> > @@ -2961,9 +2962,14 @@ void mci_of_parse_node(struct mci_host *host,
> >  	if (!host->hw_dev || !np)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	alias = of_alias_get(np);
> > -	if (alias)
> > -		host->devname = xstrdup(alias);
> > +	host->of_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "mmc");
> > +	if (host->of_id < 0)
> > +		host->of_id = of_alias_get_id(np->parent, "mmc");
> > +
> > +	if (host->of_id >= 0) {
> > +		host->devname = xasprintf("mmc%u", host->of_id);
> > +		host->of_id_valid = true;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/* "bus-width" is translated to MMC_CAP_*_BIT_DATA flags */
> >  	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width", &bus_width) < 0) {
> > @@ -3051,3 +3057,24 @@ struct mci *mci_get_device_by_name(const char *name)
> >  
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> > +
> > +struct mci *mci_get_rpmb_dev(unsigned int id)
> > +{
> > +	struct mci *mci;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(mci, &mci_list, list) {
> > +		if (mci->host->of_id != id)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		mci_detect_card(mci->host);
> > +
> > +		if (!mci->rpmb_part) {
> > +			dev_err(&mci->dev, "requested MMC does not have a RPMB partition\n");
> > +			return NULL;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		return mci;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/mci/rpmb.c b/drivers/mci/rpmb.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..6c693aa1ea
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mci/rpmb.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2014, Staubli Faverges
> > + * Pierre Aubert
> > + *
> > + * eMMC- Replay Protected Memory Block
> > + * According to JEDEC Standard No. 84-A441
> > + */
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "mmc-rpmb: " fmt
> > +
> > +#include <mci.h>
> > +#include <malloc.h>
> > +#include <dma.h>
> > +
> > +int mmc_rpmb_route_frames(struct mci *mci, void *req, unsigned long reqlen,
> > +			  void *rsp, unsigned long rsplen);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct rpmb_frame - rpmb frame as defined by eMMC 5.1 (JESD84-B51)
> > + *
> > + * @stuff        : stuff bytes
> > + * @key_mac      : The authentication key or the message authentication
> > + *                 code (MAC) depending on the request/response type.
> > + *                 The MAC will be delivered in the last (or the only)
> > + *                 block of data.
> > + * @data         : Data to be written or read by signed access.
> > + * @nonce        : Random number generated by the host for the requests
> > + *                 and copied to the response by the RPMB engine.
> > + * @write_counter: Counter value for the total amount of the successful
> > + *                 authenticated data write requests made by the host.
> > + * @addr         : Address of the data to be programmed to or read
> > + *                 from the RPMB. Address is the serial number of
> > + *                 the accessed block (half sector 256B).
> > + * @block_count  : Number of blocks (half sectors, 256B) requested to be
> > + *                 read/programmed.
> > + * @result       : Includes information about the status of the write counter
> > + *                 (valid, expired) and result of the access made to the RPMB.
> > + * @req_resp     : Defines the type of request and response to/from the memory.
> > + *
> > + * The stuff bytes and big-endian properties are modeled to fit to the spec.
> > + */
> > +struct rpmb_frame {
> > +	u8 stuff[196];
> > +	u8 key_mac[32];
> > +	u8 data[256];
> > +	u8 nonce[16];
> > +	__be32 write_counter;
> > +	__be16 addr;
> > +	__be16 block_count;
> > +	__be16 result;
> > +	__be16 req_resp;
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +#define RPMB_PROGRAM_KEY	0x1	/* Program RPMB Authentication Key */
> > +#define RPMB_GET_WRITE_COUNTER	0x2	/* Read RPMB write counter */
> > +#define RPMB_WRITE_DATA		0x3	/* Write data to RPMB partition */
> > +#define RPMB_READ_DATA		0x4	/* Read data from RPMB partition */
> > +#define RPMB_RESULT_READ	0x5	/* Read result request  (Internal) */
> > +
> > +static int mci_read_write_blocks(struct mci *mci, u32 opcode, int write_flag, void *buf,
> > +				 unsigned int buf_bytes)
> > +{
> > +	int blocks = buf_bytes / 512;
> > +	struct mci_cmd cmd = {
> > +		.cmdidx = opcode,
> > +		.resp_type = MMC_RSP_R1,
> > +	};
> > +	struct mci_data data = {
> > +		.blocks = blocks,
> > +		.blocksize = sizeof(struct rpmb_frame),
> > +	};
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (write_flag) {
> > +		data.src = buf;
> > +		data.flags = MMC_DATA_WRITE;
> > +	} else {
> > +		data.dest = buf;
> > +		data.flags = MMC_DATA_READ;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = mci_set_blockcount(mci, blocks | (write_flag & MMC_CMD23_ARG_REL_WR));
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return mci_send_cmd(mci, &cmd, &data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rpmb_route_frames(struct mci *mci, void *req,
> > +			     unsigned int req_len, void *resp,
> > +			     unsigned int resp_len)
> > +{
> > +	struct rpmb_frame *frm = req;
> > +	unsigned int cmd_count;
> > +	u16 req_type;
> > +	bool write;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (req_len < sizeof(*frm))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	req_type = be16_to_cpu(frm->req_resp);
> > +	switch (req_type) {
> > +	case RPMB_PROGRAM_KEY:
> > +		if (req_len != sizeof(struct rpmb_frame) ||
> > +		    resp_len != sizeof(struct rpmb_frame))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		write = true;
> > +		break;
> > +	case RPMB_GET_WRITE_COUNTER:
> > +		if (req_len != sizeof(struct rpmb_frame) ||
> > +		    resp_len != sizeof(struct rpmb_frame))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		write = false;
> > +		break;
> > +	case RPMB_WRITE_DATA:
> > +		if (req_len % sizeof(struct rpmb_frame) ||
> > +		    resp_len != sizeof(struct rpmb_frame))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		write = true;
> > +		break;
> > +	case RPMB_READ_DATA:
> > +		if (req_len != sizeof(struct rpmb_frame) ||
> > +		    resp_len % sizeof(struct rpmb_frame))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		write = false;
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (write)
> > +		cmd_count = 3;
> > +	else
> > +		cmd_count = 2;
> > +
> > +	if (write) {
> > +		struct rpmb_frame *frm = resp;
> > +
> > +		/* Send write request frame(s) */
> > +		ret = mci_read_write_blocks(mci, MMC_CMD_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK,
> > +			  1 | MMC_CMD23_ARG_REL_WR, req, req_len);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +		/* Send result request frame */
> > +		memset(frm, 0, sizeof(*frm));
> > +		frm->req_resp = cpu_to_be16(RPMB_RESULT_READ);
> > +		ret = mci_read_write_blocks(mci, MMC_CMD_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK, 1,
> > +					    resp, resp_len);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +		/* Read response frame */
> > +		ret = mci_read_write_blocks(mci, MMC_CMD_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK, 0,
> > +					    resp, resp_len);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* Send write request frame(s) */
> > +		ret = mci_read_write_blocks(mci, MMC_CMD_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK, 1,
> > +					    req, req_len);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +		/* Read response frame */
> > +		ret = mci_read_write_blocks(mci, MMC_CMD_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK, 0,
> > +					    resp, resp_len);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> > +	}
> > +out:
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int mci_rpmb_route_frames(struct mci *mci, void *req, unsigned long reqlen,
> > +			  void *rsp, unsigned long rsplen)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Whoever crafted the data supplied to this function knows how to
> > +	 * format the PRMB frames and which response is expected. If
> > +	 * there's some unexpected mismatch it's more helpful to report an
> > +	 * error immediately than trying to guess what was the intention
> > +	 * and possibly just delay an eventual error which will be harder
> > +	 * to track down.
> > +	 */
> > +	void *rpmb_data;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)rsp, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN) ||
> > +	    !IS_ALIGNED(rsplen, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN)) {
> > +		pr_err_once("response or length not DMA aligned\n");
> 
> A reference to the device would be useful.

I am not sure how useful it is given that this is a problem pointing to
OP-TEE only and is not specific to the given mci device. Anyway, it
shouldn't hurt either, so changed to dev_err_once()

> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	mci_blk_part_switch(mci->rpmb_part);
> > +
> > +	/* Memory alignment is required by MMC driver */
> > +	rpmb_data = dma_alloc(reqlen);
> > +	if (!rpmb_data)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	memcpy(rpmb_data, req, reqlen);
> > +
> > +	ret = rpmb_route_frames(mci, rpmb_data, reqlen, rsp, rsplen);
> > +
> > +	free(rpmb_data);
> 
> dma_free() please

OK.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-24  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19 15:30 [PATCH v2 00/10] Add " Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] mci: implement mci_set_blockcount() Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] mci: export some functions for RPMB support Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] mci: detect RPMB partitions Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] mci: add RPMB support Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:53   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2025-03-24  8:28     ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] tee: optee: probe successfully even when no devices are found Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] tee: optee: implement shared mem alloc/free RPC commands Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] tee: optee: implement RPMB support Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tee: optee: implement AVB named persistent values support Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] commands: add avb_pvalue command Sascha Hauer
2025-03-19 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] ARM: omap: remove unused file Sascha Hauer
2025-03-24  8:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Add RPMB support Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-EXr6JXt0Q_MqqQ@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=r.czerwinski@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox