From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:54:37 +0100 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQZx-00G4ur-0T for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:54:37 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQZw-0008TU-Ka for lore@pengutronix.de; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:54:37 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gjXw/r90bnDSY2iOkS+LgboYyqMR7ADGq4PW/nt8bzU=; b=NQ0E4IqjHKqnqZOrWGMhe+jaGJ TznMsklCvv4dS+lY6/7KQ5E+E53CoQfQiPcvavKHvm3PZDozG5gg8iQ0dT088j03jhR1FUS1SZj/g eLEmQdOkF6sVWI63VeF/7C/VBDTfMGRxLtofVKS5ngmNaGF3TuhWA9ZKLl6doWKafyLA64swPBUus VKYx/gYMFkyW0eunpPqb2uicHqI5pF/DcHVAHh/lrsuE1VwtrK3ylNsi9PFQLGcZ+VzCb96r+bKui gdzUIa+V6uH6yv6zedgvaXEm+GI+32u60L1QN+rBEsIElK0BHdgLoBDU5rMDgZs35PcZCtPrs+FSE uAS69laQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rcQZJ-0000000EzNF-0Shk; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:53:57 +0000 Received: from mail.gnudd.com ([93.91.132.248]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rcQZF-0000000EzLF-32b6 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:53:55 +0000 Received: from rubini by mail.gnudd.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcQZ9-00081T-3Q for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0100 From: Alessandro Rubini To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: GnuDD, Device Drivers, Embedded Systems, Courses In-Reply-To: <20240220004316.fdc79907089c7358a1e67f62@gmail.com> References: <20240220004316.fdc79907089c7358a1e67f62@gmail.com> <20240205125900.c4b182f57b6efe0152beee24@gmail.com> <90de314f-b7a7-4b49-8c72-ec45aa3d38e2@pengutronix.de> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240220_055353_781184_BA28F79C X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.71 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: NFSv4 boot support? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) >> This hasn't >> seen development activity in 5 years. > > Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either. >> lwIP on the other hand still sees active development. > > I agree with you. It looks like lwIP is more popular than picotcp. Sure. It's older and it has a loyal (or addicted) user base and commercial support. Or it just needs more commits because it'w worse and full of bugs. As far as I know, lwIP is horrible code, difficult to integrate and maintain, while picotcp is designed in the right way (although I admit I only looked at the former, about picotcp I only talked with the main author without looking at the code). I'd love to add mqtt to my microcontroller projects, where I have udp but no tcp yet, and I would never rely on lwIP. That's just a personal opinion, but I'd better not rely on the date of last commit to pick or not pick a library. Regards /alessandro