Re: [PATCH 2/2] mci: arasan: fix build for non-ZynqMP

[Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 12:50:42PM +0100, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> Registering sdclk only makes sense on the ZynqMP architecture. Guard
> calling the function with a IS_ENABLED()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mci/arasan-sdhci.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/arasan-sdhci.c b/drivers/mci/arasan-sdhci.c
> index f01396d7ee..b7dd98049f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/arasan-sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mci/arasan-sdhci.c
> @@ -772,7 +772,8 @@ static int arasan_sdhci_probe(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	mci->f_min = 50000000 / 256;
>  
> -	arasan_sdhci_register_sdclk(&arasan_sdhci->clk_data, clk_xin, dev);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP))
> +		arasan_sdhci_register_sdclk(&arasan_sdhci->clk_data, clk_xin, dev);

CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP being enabled doesn't necessarily mean the code
actually runs on Zynqmp. Does this need a runtime check for other
architectures?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |