From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:10:28 +0200 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sEBCW-0015j3-1j for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:10:28 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sEBCV-0004SL-Ve for lore@pengutronix.de; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:10:28 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=l8TDpsjEkDDJbzBryVMxnQccqIcJPZefYpcBm5qsTM4=; b=kbbMOeBrIUE2kTX7njadYVbO4i 4UJK2eF/DFrRtQ8juAdYntAKKdOTeR6UoAOAucU9UfWMP5p4C1SY1HDxpZU51Tt5+d2aRO1YX1Dca X8NSDlZ7hVfNZa/AJ1cp3U8V1wuQVIG5/bp0w5qHsJx79C0ZQI7tKkwgo19M++zWYvT88azkEFJ0/ rKogHCdpiUjAwWvTWckhvH09Y051Lu3Suyk0ftluUoSgyEwh5jjrHjGtUhR9iLONIAFBUB2LOWDqH a9s9hsJTfDq0HGZHD/kbPR1ExnrNkupfBgfG++Ff3oV30CE2+J5BVA0bHo7FbyZG8ty7DcmHOWKrx 2/0ro+Kg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sEBBs-0000000HSop-1i8P; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 17:09:48 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sEBBo-0000000HSoG-40oT for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 17:09:47 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sEBBl-0004Pk-9j; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:09:41 +0200 Received: from [2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::c5] (helo=pty.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sEBBk-0006Ko-Lf; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:09:40 +0200 Received: from sha by pty.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sEBBk-007Vdc-1o; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 19:09:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 19:09:40 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Antony Pavlov Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240603_100945_116907_D6E2E2A8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.72 ) X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: barebox + picotcp X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) Hi Antony, I am currently playing with your barebox picotcp integration in order to get it into mainline. I am currently on your picotcp v2.1 branch and noticed you had to disable TCP support. I wonder if v2.1 is the way forward or if it's the v1.7 based branch instead. The v2.1 branch is newer, but also hasn't seen any activity for multiple years now. One of the main features of the v2.1 branch is that it introduces PICO_SUPPORT_TICKLESS, from which I don't exactly know if we want/need it, but what I do see is that the stack won't compile when this option is enabled. Do you have any thoughts what could be the way forward? Regards Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |